Table 3.

Discriminant validity

Constructs12345678910
Fornell and Larcker’s procedure          
1. Financial risk0.843         
2. Performance risk0.8170.855        
3. Security and privacy risk0.6120.6420.871       
4. Social risk0.5910.590.5180.915      
5. Amount of public information0.2150.2970.2010.0240.934     
6. Social media information-seeking0.3440.3620.4170.5630.3620.928    
7. Rational decision style0.1520.2360.2350.1030.4710.1580.915   
8. Intuitive decision style0.1960.2060.2850.3760.1520.4890.2570.838  
9. Initial trust0.3440.4240.3830.3680.620.6220.4120.3810.890 
10. Behavioural intention0.2590.2950.2990.560.1830.5720.1030.4620.6130.925
Heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations
1. Financial risk          
2. Performance risk0.961         
3. Security and privacy risk0.6980.767        
4. Social risk0.6520.6720.587       
5. Amount of public information0.2290.340.2190.045      
6. Social media information-seeking0.3800.4140.4780.6050.386     
7. Rational decision style0.1590.2700.2570.1130.4940.164    
8. Intuitive decision style0.2220.2360.3240.4070.1630.5380.274   
9. Initial trust0.3780.4880.4320.3940.6650.6790.4390.419  
10. Behavioural intention0.2880.3380.3450.6000.1950.6230.1140.5110.666 

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options