The impact of evasion on top income shares
| Reported data | Fraud-adjusted data | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top 10 (%) | Top 1 (%) | Top 10 (%) | Top 1 (%) | |
| 2001 | 34.9 | 9.8 | 40.4 | 12.9 |
| 2002 | 34.2 | 9.5 | 36.9 | 10.9 |
| 2003 | 34.5 | 10.0 | 36.2 | 10.8 |
| 2004 | 34.4 | 10.2 | 38.9 | 12.9 |
| Reported data | Fraud-adjusted data | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top 10 (%) | Top 1 (%) | Top 10 (%) | Top 1 (%) | |
| 2001 | 34.9 | 9.8 | 40.4 | 12.9 |
| 2002 | 34.2 | 9.5 | 36.9 | 10.9 |
| 2003 | 34.5 | 10.0 | 36.2 | 10.8 |
| 2004 | 34.4 | 10.2 | 38.9 | 12.9 |
Note:
The top 10 and 1% here refer to population over 20, following Alvaredo and Saez (2009)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.