Logit model on adaptation of water conservation technologies/practices
| Explanatory variables | Marginal effectsa coefficients |
|---|---|
| Constant | – |
| −0.392 | |
| Age of the household head | 0.0003 |
| Household size | 0.008 |
| Land holding size | 0.008* |
| Perceived threat of food security (dummy) | 0.368* |
| Gender of the household head (dummy) | −0.260** |
| Education of the household head (scale) | 0.130* |
| Perception on increased occurrence of drought during rainy season | 0.241** |
| Households having income also from non-agricultural sources (dummy) | 0.240** |
| Village location (dummy) | −0.325*** |
| Pseudo R Square | 0.236 |
| Log likelihood | 126.50 |
| LR Chi-square | 32.16 |
| Prob > Chi-square | 0.0002 |
| Overall percentage correctly predicted | 73.3 |
| Explanatory variables | Marginal effects |
|---|---|
| Constant | – |
| −0.392 | |
| Age of the household head | 0.0003 |
| Household size | 0.008 |
| Land holding size | 0.008 |
| Perceived threat of food security (dummy) | 0.368 |
| Gender of the household head (dummy) | −0.260 |
| Education of the household head (scale) | 0.130 |
| Perception on increased occurrence of drought during rainy season | 0.241 |
| Households having income also from non-agricultural sources (dummy) | 0.240 |
| Village location (dummy) | −0.325 |
| Pseudo | 0.236 |
| Log likelihood | 126.50 |
| LR Chi-square | 32.16 |
| Prob > Chi-square | 0.0002 |
| Overall percentage correctly predicted | 73.3 |
Notes:
***, ** and * denotes 1, 5 and 10% significant level respectively;
Marginal effects refer to the partial derivatives of the expected value with respect to the vector of characteristics. They are computed at the means of the Xs