Parameters of comparisons for the inbound zone
| Parameter | Case 1 RTGC 4 + 1 and RTGC 6 + 1 | Case 2 RTGC 6 + 1 | Case 3 RMGC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stacking [number of stacks] | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Block [TEUs] | 18,752 | 21,048 | 21,048 |
| Annual yard capacity [TEUs] | 883,159 | 991,293 | 991,293 |
| Compare to current capacity [TEUs] | +210,735 | +318,839 | +318,839 |
| Forecasting inbound containers in 2039 [TEUs] | 991,100 | 991,100 | 991,100 |
| Total container yard development cost [Baht] | 620,057,643 | 597,407,236 | 511,647,356 |
| Total equipment cost [Baht] | 1,363,600,000 | 1,632,400,000 | 3,040,000,000 |
| Total wages and salaries [Baht] | 12,715,104,179 | 12,715,104,179 | 12,715,104,179 |
| Total maintenance cost [Baht] | 396,529,449 | 396,529,449 | 408,374,680 |
| Total fuel and power [Baht] | 1,271,981,074 | 1,271,981,074 | 661,527,509 |
| Total cost [Baht] | 16,327,030,303 | 16,574,023,655 | 17,336,629,570 |
| Parameter | Case 1 RTGC 4 + 1 and RTGC 6 + 1 | Case 2 RTGC 6 + 1 | Case 3 RMGC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stacking [number of stacks] | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Block [TEUs] | 18,752 | 21,048 | 21,048 |
| Annual yard capacity [TEUs] | 883,159 | 991,293 | 991,293 |
| Compare to current capacity [TEUs] | +210,735 | +318,839 | +318,839 |
| Forecasting inbound containers in 2039 [TEUs] | 991,100 | 991,100 | 991,100 |
| Total container yard development cost [Baht] | 620,057,643 | 597,407,236 | 511,647,356 |
| Total equipment cost [Baht] | 1,363,600,000 | 1,632,400,000 | 3,040,000,000 |
| Total wages and salaries [Baht] | 12,715,104,179 | 12,715,104,179 | 12,715,104,179 |
| Total maintenance cost [Baht] | 396,529,449 | 396,529,449 | 408,374,680 |
| Total fuel and power [Baht] | 1,271,981,074 | 1,271,981,074 | 661,527,509 |
| Total cost [Baht] | 16,327,030,303 | 16,574,023,655 | 17,336,629,570 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.