Relevance of PPCPs as financing models for Zimbabwean agriculture
| Relevance | Summary of descriptive statistics | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean score | Standard deviation | |
| PPCPs enhance value chain collaboration and mutual benefits | 4.45 | 0.62 |
| PPCPs make it possible to integrate smallholder farmers into high value chain markets | 4.37 | 0.59 |
| Access to adequate inputs by farmers is enhanced and PPCPs enhance yields and national output | 4.41 | 0.49 |
| PPCPs enhance the ability to adopt new technology | 4.42 | 0.50 |
| PPCPs enhance mobilisation of resources, which is not possible without collaboration | 4.28 | 0.58 |
| Multi-stakeholder collaborations help in reducing information asymmetries, enhance transparency, and trust | 4.47 | 0.50 |
| There is risk sharing in PPCPs | 4.24 | 1.19 |
| Relevance | Summary of descriptive statistics | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean score | Standard deviation | |
| PPCPs enhance value chain collaboration and mutual benefits | 4.45 | 0.62 |
| PPCPs make it possible to integrate smallholder farmers into high value chain markets | 4.37 | 0.59 |
| Access to adequate inputs by farmers is enhanced and PPCPs enhance yields and national output | 4.41 | 0.49 |
| PPCPs enhance the ability to adopt new technology | 4.42 | 0.50 |
| PPCPs enhance mobilisation of resources, which is not possible without collaboration | 4.28 | 0.58 |
| Multi-stakeholder collaborations help in reducing information asymmetries, enhance transparency, and trust | 4.47 | 0.50 |
| There is risk sharing in PPCPs | 4.24 | 1.19 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.