Table 2

Power and narratives of actors in the deliberative forum on loss and damage

ActorsPowerDominant Narratives
(a)(b)(c)
Knowledge and ExpertiseResourcesStatus
Government Bureaucrats, Politicians, Regional Policy Planners, Science expertsHigh
Scientific, Administrative, Legal
High
Economic resources, Funding gatekeepers
High
Social and political
Logical-rational narratives
Legal or institutional and Empirical or scientific
Civil Society Groups, Climate Activists, Professional GroupsHigh
Ideology, Scientific
Medium
Funding, economic resources, *social capital
Medium
Social and political
Normative Narratives
Driven by ideology & belief systems (At times, uses logical-rational narratives too)
Community Leaders, People’s Organizations, Indigenous Group LeadersMedium
Scientific,
*Ideology,
*Socio-cultural, *Sectoral
Medium
*Social capital
Low
∼Social and political
Normative Narratives
(Strong emphasis on ideology & belief systems)
Community Members, Individual Fisherfolks & FarmersHigh
Socio-cultural,
Local knowledge
*Experiential,
Low
Economic
Low
Social and political
Emotional Narratives
(Outright expression of feelings and sentiments)

Legend: *relatively high, ∼ relatively medium/moderate

Source: By author, drawn from observations at the 2022 Southeast Asia loss and damage workshop

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal