Power and narratives of actors in the deliberative forum on loss and damage
| Actors | Power | Dominant Narratives | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||
| Knowledge and Expertise | Resources | Status | ||
| Government Bureaucrats, Politicians, Regional Policy Planners, Science experts | High Scientific, Administrative, Legal | High Economic resources, Funding gatekeepers | High Social and political | Logical-rational narratives Legal or institutional and Empirical or scientific |
| Civil Society Groups, Climate Activists, Professional Groups | High Ideology, Scientific | Medium Funding, economic resources, *social capital | Medium Social and political | Normative Narratives Driven by ideology & belief systems (At times, uses logical-rational narratives too) |
| Community Leaders, People’s Organizations, Indigenous Group Leaders | Medium Scientific, *Ideology, *Socio-cultural, *Sectoral | Medium *Social capital | Low ∼Social and political | Normative Narratives (Strong emphasis on ideology & belief systems) |
| Community Members, Individual Fisherfolks & Farmers | High Socio-cultural, Local knowledge *Experiential, | Low Economic | Low Social and political | Emotional Narratives (Outright expression of feelings and sentiments) |
| Actors | Power | Dominant Narratives | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||
| Government Bureaucrats, Politicians, Regional Policy Planners, Science experts | ||||
| Civil Society Groups, Climate Activists, Professional Groups | ||||
| Community Leaders, People’s Organizations, Indigenous Group Leaders | ||||
| Community Members, Individual Fisherfolks & Farmers | ||||
Legend: *relatively high, ∼ relatively medium/moderate
Source: By author, drawn from observations at the 2022 Southeast Asia loss and damage workshop