Table 2 Logistic regression analysis...

Table 2

Logistic regression analysis showing associations between study approach scores and exam grade (n = 110)

	Unadjusted model			Adjusted model
Independent variables	OR	95% CI	p	OR	95% CI	p
Age group	1.20	0.66–2.18	0.55	1.51	0.72–3.14	0.28
Gender	6.90	1.36–35.02	<0.05	8.17	1.25–53.48	<0.05
Hours of independent studying	0.98	0.95–1.02	0.31	0.98	0.94–1.02	0.28
Deep approach score	0.96	0.84–1.09	0.50	0.90	0.77–1.05	0.18
Strategic approach score	1.16	1.04–1.28	<0.01	1.15	1.02–1.30	<0.05
Surface approach score	0.89	0.80–0.99	<0.05	0.92	0.82–1.04	0.17

	Unadjusted model			Adjusted model
Independent variables	OR	95% CI	p	OR	95% CI	p
Age group	1.20	0.66–2.18	0.55	1.51	0.72–3.14	0.28
Gender	6.90	1.36–35.02	<0.05	8.17	1.25–53.48	<0.05
Hours of independent studying	0.98	0.95–1.02	0.31	0.98	0.94–1.02	0.28
Deep approach score	0.96	0.84–1.09	0.50	0.90	0.77–1.05	0.18
Strategic approach score	1.16	1.04–1.28	<0.01	1.15	1.02–1.30	<0.05
Surface approach score	0.89	0.80–0.99	<0.05	0.92	0.82–1.04	0.17

Notes:

Reference categories are lower age group, male gender, less time spent on independent studying and lower scores on the deep, strategic and surface study approach scales. Adjusted model parameters: Nagelkerke R² = 0.22, Cox and Snell R² = 0.16, Model χ² = 19.73, p < 0.01. Hosmer Lemeshow: χ² = 6.62, p = 0.58

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable