Table III. Study 1: Model output... | Emerald Publishing

Table III.

Study 1: Model output

		Consequent
		M (HC)				Y (OP)
		β	SE	p ≤		β	SE	p ≤
Constant	i_M	3.01	0.55	0.000	i_Y	0.55	0.27	0.047
X (LC)	a₁	0.46	0.10	0.000	c′	0.54	0.04	0.001
D1 (WL)	a₂	0.22	0.62	0.728
D2 (WL)	a₃	1.67	0.69	0.016
XD1 (LC × WL)	a₄	−0.03	0.11	0.814
XD2 (LC × WL)	a₅	−0.27	0.12	0.027
M (HC)					b	0.22	0.05	0.001

	R² = 0.19				R² = 0.38
	F(3, 445) = 33.59, p < 0.001				F(2, 446) = 138.65, p < 0.001

		Consequent
		M (HC)				Y (OP)
		β	SE	p ≤		β	SE	p ≤
Constant	i_M	3.01	0.55	0.000	i_Y	0.55	0.27	0.047
X (LC)	a₁	0.46	0.10	0.000	c′	0.54	0.04	0.001
D1 (WL)	a₂	0.22	0.62	0.728
D2 (WL)	a₃	1.67	0.69	0.016
XD1 (LC × WL)	a₄	−0.03	0.11	0.814
XD2 (LC × WL)	a₅	−0.27	0.12	0.027
M (HC)					b	0.22	0.05	0.001

	R² = 0.19				R² = 0.38
	F(3, 445) = 33.59, p < 0.001				F(2, 446) = 138.65, p < 0.001

Notes:

LC: learning culture; WL: workforce level; HC: human capital; OP: operational performance