Supplier involvement levels, environment and quality results
| Project | Early supplier integration (described in Table I) | Environment | Performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System design | Component design | Design reviews | Design adjustments | Design for X | Supplier agreements | Project complexity | Team maturity | Quality | |
| Liverpool | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Madagascar | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Amsterdam | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Canada | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Rivoli | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Sudbury | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Santiago | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Tokyo | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| Project | Early supplier integration (described in | Environment | Performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System design | Component design | Design reviews | Design adjustments | Design for X | Supplier agreements | Project complexity | Team maturity | Quality | |
| Liverpool | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Madagascar | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Amsterdam | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Canada | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Rivoli | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Sudbury | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Santiago | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Tokyo | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
Notes: 5 High 3 Medium 1 Low; At the time of the study, Gibraltar and Ontario were still in development; Kimberley was cancelled before production and Montreal was R&D only
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.