Discriminant validity
| Variables | Confidence interval | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Convenience – Social | (0.02; 0.44) | 0.07 |
| Convenience – Emotional | (0.50; 0.78) | 0.00 |
| Convenience – Epistemic | (0.52; 0.81) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Social | (0.16; 0.53) | 0.00 |
| Epistemic – Social | (0.31; 0.63) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Epistemic | (0.73; 0.90) | 0.00 |
| Quality information – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.26; 0.58) | 0.00 |
| Convenience – Quality information | (0.21; 0.55) | 0.00 |
| Quality of the health information of the destination – Social | (0.16; 0.47) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Quality of the health information of the destination | (0.31; 0.63) | 0.00 |
| Epistemic – Quality of the health information of the destination | (0.30; 0.62) | 0.00 |
| Convenience – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.22; 0.62) | 0.00 |
| Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services – Social | (0.28; 0.65) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.51; 0.76) | 0.00 |
| Epistemic – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.47; 0.74) | 0.00 |
| Quality of the health information of the destination – Previous image of the OTA | (−0.03; 0.31) | 0.17 |
| Condicional – Previous image of the OTA | (0.09; 0.44) | 0.02 |
| Emotional – Previous image of the OTA | (0.07; 0.44) | 0.02 |
| Epistemic – Previous image of the OTA | (0.08; 0.49) | 0.02 |
| Previous image of the OTA – Convenience | (0.23; 0.57) | 0.00 |
| Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services – Previous image of the OTA | (0.17; 0.53) | 0.00 |
| Variables | Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|
| Convenience – Social | (0.02; 0.44) | 0.07 |
| Convenience – Emotional | (0.50; 0.78) | 0.00 |
| Convenience – Epistemic | (0.52; 0.81) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Social | (0.16; 0.53) | 0.00 |
| Epistemic – Social | (0.31; 0.63) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Epistemic | (0.73; 0.90) | 0.00 |
| Quality information – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.26; 0.58) | 0.00 |
| Convenience – Quality information | (0.21; 0.55) | 0.00 |
| Quality of the health information of the destination – Social | (0.16; 0.47) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Quality of the health information of the destination | (0.31; 0.63) | 0.00 |
| Epistemic – Quality of the health information of the destination | (0.30; 0.62) | 0.00 |
| Convenience – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.22; 0.62) | 0.00 |
| Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services – Social | (0.28; 0.65) | 0.00 |
| Emotional – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.51; 0.76) | 0.00 |
| Epistemic – Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services | (0.47; 0.74) | 0.00 |
| Quality of the health information of the destination – Previous image of the OTA | (−0.03; 0.31) | 0.17 |
| Condicional – Previous image of the OTA | (0.09; 0.44) | 0.02 |
| Emotional – Previous image of the OTA | (0.07; 0.44) | 0.02 |
| Epistemic – Previous image of the OTA | (0.08; 0.49) | 0.02 |
| Previous image of the OTA – Convenience | (0.23; 0.57) | 0.00 |
| Intention to reuse the OTAs’ services – Previous image of the OTA | (0.17; 0.53) | 0.00 |
Source(s): The authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.