Table VI. Gaps pointed out by the... | Emerald Publishing

Table VI.

Gaps pointed out by the analyzed works

Indicated gaps	Authors
Critical reflection on scalability and process results.	Pitt and Jones (2016), Berzin and Pitt-Catsouphes (2015)
Preparation of cases for teaching.	Berzin and Pitt-Catsouphes (2015)
Development of Models/Instruments capable of measuring the social impact of SI (financial and non-financial). Development of social impact indicators.	Konda et al. (2015), Hadad and Gauca (2014) Iizuka et al. (2014), Bloom and Skloot (2010)
Scalability Process Analysis	Chaves et al. (2017), Pandey et al. (2017), Maguirre et al. (2016), Voltan and Fuentes (2016), Moura et al. (2015), Trémolet et al. (2015), Beckie et al. (2012), Perrini et al. (2010), Douthwaite et al. (2003)
The Scalability Process of Government Programs	Maguirre et al. (2016)
Exploring the scalability process of specific industries	Warnecke and Houndonougbo (2016)
SI governance during the scalability process	Nascimento et al. (2012)
Observe under different lenses (Resource-Based Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Agency Theory, Organizational and Interorganizational Learning and Competence, Institutional Theory, and others)	Silva et al. (2016)
Aspects (political, cultural and religious) and strategic factors that imply the process of scalability (under the lens of agents and stakeholders)	Voltan and Fuentes (2016), Moura et al. (2015), Wiguna and Manzilati (2014), Beckie et al. (2012)
Motivation of social entrepreneurs to promote the scalability process	Braga et al. (2014), Iizuka et al. (2014), Wiguna and Manzilati (2014)
Comparative studies	Moura et al. (2015)
Explore the potential for scalability in social innovation (pointing to factors and possibilities)	Gramescu (2016)
Descriptive study on SI scalability	Iizuka et al. (2014)

Indicated gaps	Authors
Critical reflection on scalability and process results.	Pitt and Jones (2016), Berzin and Pitt-Catsouphes (2015)
Preparation of cases for teaching.	Berzin and Pitt-Catsouphes (2015)
Development of Models/Instruments capable of measuring the social impact of SI (financial and non-financial). Development of social impact indicators.	Konda et al. (2015), Hadad and Gauca (2014) Iizuka et al. (2014), Bloom and Skloot (2010)
Scalability Process Analysis	Chaves et al. (2017), Pandey et al. (2017), Maguirre et al. (2016), Voltan and Fuentes (2016), Moura et al. (2015), Trémolet et al. (2015), Beckie et al. (2012), Perrini et al. (2010), Douthwaite et al. (2003)
The Scalability Process of Government Programs	Maguirre et al. (2016)
Exploring the scalability process of specific industries	Warnecke and Houndonougbo (2016)
SI governance during the scalability process	Nascimento et al. (2012)
Observe under different lenses (Resource-Based Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Agency Theory, Organizational and Interorganizational Learning and Competence, Institutional Theory, and others)	Silva et al. (2016)
Aspects (political, cultural and religious) and strategic factors that imply the process of scalability (under the lens of agents and stakeholders)	Voltan and Fuentes (2016), Moura et al. (2015), Wiguna and Manzilati (2014), Beckie et al. (2012)
Motivation of social entrepreneurs to promote the scalability process	Braga et al. (2014), Iizuka et al. (2014), Wiguna and Manzilati (2014)
Comparative studies	Moura et al. (2015)
Explore the potential for scalability in social innovation (pointing to factors and possibilities)	Gramescu (2016)
Descriptive study on SI scalability	Iizuka et al. (2014)