Table 3. Results of the evaluation of...

Table 3.

Results of the evaluation of the SEM measurement model

	Cronbach’s alpha (CA)	Composite reliability (CR)	Average variance extracted (AVE)	R²	R² adjusted	Predictive validity Q²	Discriminant validity (DV)
CA	0.736	0.883	0.790	0.560	0.558	0.426	0.753
RT	0.742	0.853	0.660	0.747	0.746	0.482	0.743
AU	0.756	0.858	0.668	0.495	0.493	0.308	0.784
IN	0.540	0.812	0.684	0.441	0.438	0.292	0.544
AM	0.705	0.811	0.521	0.197	0.169	0.076	0.727
EO	0.843	0.870	0.858*	–	–	–	0.871
PR	0.695	0.867	0.765	0.509	0.506	0.376	0.703

	Cronbach’s alpha (CA)	Composite reliability (CR)	Average variance extracted (AVE)	R²	R²adjusted	Predictive validity Q²	Discriminant validity (DV)
CA	0.736	0.883	0.790	0.560	0.558	0.426	0.753
RT	0.742	0.853	0.660	0.747	0.746	0.482	0.743
AU	0.756	0.858	0.668	0.495	0.493	0.308	0.784
IN	0.540	0.812	0.684	0.441	0.438	0.292	0.544
AM	0.705	0.811	0.521	0.197	0.169	0.076	0.727
EO	0.843	0.870	0.858*	–	–	–	0.871
PR	0.695	0.867	0.765	0.509	0.506	0.376	0.703

Note:

*(LV of 2nd order with recalculated AVE); (Q²) or Stoner–Geisser test; (R²) Pearson’s coefficient

Source: Research data extracted from software SmartPLS 3.0 (Ringle et al., 2015)