Strengths and weaknesses of the approaches and methods used by the TTO
| Approach | Strengths | Weaknesses | Main methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Sunk Cost | It provides the basis for patent valuation. | Considered the worst by the TTO for not clearly reflecting the potential of the technology. Inputs survey. |
| Market | Royalty Rates | Consolidated and reliable bibliography. Support from renowned international institutions (e.g. benchmarking). TTO’s trading history on a database. | Basis for Royalty Rates for Licensing Intellectual Property (Parr, 2012) is considered outdated by the TTO. |
| Finance | Cash Flow Discounting | No relevant point was highlighted or checked during the interview. | Little used by the TTO. Does not support negotiation. Values less reliable than those obtained with market and cost approaches. Less justifiable for university and clients. |
| Approach | Strengths | Weaknesses | Main methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Sunk Cost | It provides the basis for patent valuation. | Considered the worst by the TTO for not clearly reflecting the potential of the technology. |
| Market | Royalty Rates | Consolidated and reliable bibliography. | Basis for Royalty Rates for Licensing Intellectual |
| Finance | Cash Flow Discounting | No relevant point was highlighted or checked during the interview. | Little used by the TTO. |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.