Table 2. Link scores for each paper and...

Table 2.

Link scores for each paper and cluster identified by VosViewer®

Author(s)	Year	Citations	CPY	Link-score	Cluster
Erickson and Rothberg	2017	11	2.75	35	Blue
Gravili et al.	2020	0	–	28
Wang et al.	2020	3	3.00	11
Goffey et al.	2014	4	0.57	7
Petković and Lukić	2013	0	–	5
Chinnaswamy et al.	2019	4	2.00	3
Harz	2017	0	–	1
Marelli et al.	2020	4	4.00	24	Green
French	2014	19	2.71	21
Andanda	2019	1	0.50	14
Heath-Kelly	2017	30	7.50	9
Fiore-Gartland and Neff	2015	46	7.67	6
de Magalhães et al.	2016	1	0.20	4
Kim and Park	2017	18	4.50	4
Roberts	2019	1	0.50	1
Milusheva	2020	0	–	2
Dhagarra et al.	2019	4	2.00	7	Purple
Klingwort and Schnell	2020	0	–	2	Purple
Cinnamon et al.	2016	27	5.40	21	Red
Du et al.	2020	0	–	10
Rains	2020	1	1.00	8
Xia et al.	2019	10	5.00	5
Ellaway et al.	2014	76	10.86	5
Huang et al.	2020	0	–	4
Wang and Hajli	2017	106	26.50	22	Yellow
Ratia et al.	2018	2	0.67	23
Fiske et al.	2019	13	6.50	6
Swain	2016	9	1.80	2
Holtrop et al.	2019	3	1.50	2

Author(s)	Year	Citations	CPY	Link-score	Cluster
Erickson and Rothberg	2017	11	2.75	35	Blue
Gravili et al.	2020	0	–	28
Wang et al.	2020	3	3.00	11
Goffey et al.	2014	4	0.57	7
Petković and Lukić	2013	0	–	5
Chinnaswamy et al.	2019	4	2.00	3
Harz	2017	0	–	1
Marelli et al.	2020	4	4.00	24	Green
French	2014	19	2.71	21
Andanda	2019	1	0.50	14
Heath-Kelly	2017	30	7.50	9
Fiore-Gartland and Neff	2015	46	7.67	6
de Magalhães et al.	2016	1	0.20	4
Kim and Park	2017	18	4.50	4
Roberts	2019	1	0.50	1
Milusheva	2020	0	–	2
Dhagarra et al.	2019	4	2.00	7	Purple
Klingwort and Schnell	2020	0	–	2	Purple
Cinnamon et al.	2016	27	5.40	21	Red
Du et al.	2020	0	–	10
Rains	2020	1	1.00	8
Xia et al.	2019	10	5.00	5
Ellaway et al.	2014	76	10.86	5
Huang et al.	2020	0	–	4
Wang and Hajli	2017	106	26.50	22	Yellow
Ratia et al.	2018	2	0.67	23
Fiske et al.	2019	13	6.50	6
Swain	2016	9	1.80	2
Holtrop et al.	2019	3	1.50	2

Sharing Unavailable