Aligning Pearson’s range to AHP
| Pearson’s range organized from GII’s audit | AHP scale compared to Pearson’s correlation | Saaty’s comparison scale | Saaty’s scale of importance |
|---|---|---|---|
| [0, 0.39] | 1 | Equal importance | 1 |
| [0.40, 0.49] | 2 | Weak dominance | 3 |
| [0.50, 0.59] | 3 | Strong dominance | 5 |
| [0.60, 0.69] | 4 | Demonstrated dominance | 7 |
| [0.70, 0.79] | 5 | Absolute dominance | 9 |
| [0.80, 0.89] | 6 | (Intermediate values) | (2, 4, 6, 8) |
| [0.90, 0.99] | 7 |
| Pearson’s range organized from GII’s audit | AHP scale compared to Pearson’s correlation | Saaty’s comparison scale | Saaty’s scale of importance |
|---|---|---|---|
| [0, 0.39] | 1 | Equal importance | 1 |
| [0.40, 0.49] | 2 | Weak dominance | 3 |
| [0.50, 0.59] | 3 | Strong dominance | 5 |
| [0.60, 0.69] | 4 | Demonstrated dominance | 7 |
| [0.70, 0.79] | 5 | Absolute dominance | 9 |
| [0.80, 0.89] | 6 | (Intermediate values) | (2, 4, 6, 8) |
| [0.90, 0.99] | 7 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.