Regression results of the PSM-DID model
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Livelihood capital | Livelihood capital | Livelihood capital | |
| DID | 0.1565*** (36.89) | 0.1565*** (36.86) | 0.1567*** (36.87) |
| Family population | 0.0066*** (5.32) | 0.0066*** (5.32) | 0.0066*** (5.31) |
| Causes of poverty | 0.0001 (0.10) | 0.0002 (0.14) | |
| Administrative village | −0.0077 (−0.93) | ||
| _cons | 0.1327*** (27.92) | 0.1323*** (20.83) | 0.1737*** (3.85) |
| Time fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Individual fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 7,053 | 7,053 | 7,053 |
| R2 | 0.890 | 0.890 | 0.890 |
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Livelihood capital | Livelihood capital | Livelihood capital | |
| 0.1565 | 0.1565 | 0.1567 | |
| Family population | 0.0066 | 0.0066 | 0.0066 |
| Causes of poverty | 0.0001 (0.10) | 0.0002 (0.14) | |
| Administrative village | −0.0077 (−0.93) | ||
| _cons | 0.1327 | 0.1323 | 0.1737 |
| Time fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Individual fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 7,053 | 7,053 | 7,053 | |
| 0.890 | 0.890 | 0.890 |
Notes:
t-values are reported in the parentheses;
***indicated significance at 1% level