Included and not included attributes in Gil et al. (2000) scale
| Included attributes | Not included attributes |
|---|---|
| Health benefit | Long shelf-life (Radman, 2005) |
| Quality | Nice appearance (Radman, 2005) |
| Fraud | Less residues (Ureña et al.., 2008) |
| Tasty | Certified products (Ventura-Lucas and Marreiros, 2013) |
| Worse than conventional ones | Good value for money (Mehra and Ratna, 2014) |
| Expensive | Small variety of organic products (Mehra and Ratna, 2014) |
| Attractive | Fresh (Rojas–Méndez et al., 2015) |
| No harmful effects | Security (Stolz et al., 2011; Drugova, 2019) |
| Fashion | Not beneficial to local farmers (Drugova, 2019) |
| Included attributes | Not included attributes |
|---|---|
| Health benefit | Long shelf-life ( |
| Quality | Nice appearance ( |
| Fraud | Less residues ( |
| Tasty | Certified products ( |
| Worse than conventional ones | Good value for money ( |
| Expensive | Small variety of organic products ( |
| Attractive | Fresh ( |
| No harmful effects | Security ( |
| Fashion | Not beneficial to local farmers ( |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.