Table 5

Joint display of integrated findings

Training effectiveness evaluation criteriaQuantitative findings (TG = Training; CG = Control)Qualitative findings (T = Theme)Integrated analysis
Reactions
  • • TG participants had a positive attitude toward the training content

  • • TG participants were highly satisfied with the instructor and training materials

  • • Sense of Accomplishment (T1): Pride in passing the certification exam; recognition from coworkers, managers and the corporate team

    • •“I'm the wine guy now

  • • Defeat (T4): Feelings of disappointment and discouragement upon receiving the exam results

    • •“…it's like I wasted six weeks

  • • Immediate reactions to the wine education program were consistently positive, but diverged when the certification exam results were distributed a month later

Learning
  • • Significant increase in TG wine knowledge from pre-test to post-test

  • • 70.5% of TG passed the certification exam

  • • Sense of Accomplishment (T1): Recognition of learning and knowledge gained

    • •“I did not pass the exam but I learned so much from doing this

  • • The wine education program was effective in positively impacting learning

Transfer
  • • TG participants indicated a high level of transfer motivation

  • • No significant difference in reported transfer motivation between participants who passed the certification exam and participants who failed the certification exam

  • • Enhanced Guest Interaction (T2): Positive changes to guest-facing behavior, including more time with each table and focusing on “ideal” food-wine pairings

    • •“I have so much I want to tell [guests]

    • •“I'm suggesting wines that pair with the food. Sometimes they might be cheaper.”

  • • Defeat (T4): Uncertain or confused as to how to transfer knowledge to sales

    • •“I don't think we spent enough time practicing selling

  • • Participants' transfer motivation was high at the end of the wine education program but motivation to transfer did not lead to actual training transfer for all participants

Financial results
  • • No effect of training on wine sales

    • •No significant difference between TG and CG for wine check average or wine mix

    • •No significant interaction between group (TG vs CG) and time (pre-training to 60 days post-training) for wine check average or wine mix

  • • Within the TG, wine mix was significantly higher for participants who failed the certification exam (16.0%) than for exam (13.2%)

  • • Tips and Gratuities (T3): Increase in direct compensation from guests as a result of participation in the wine education program

    • •“My average take home in tips has definitely gone up

  • • Defeat (T4): Use of a scripted upselling strategy focused on price point

  • •“If I have to make a recommendation, I suggest the more expensive one because I make my money on how much the final bill is

  • • For participants who passed the certification exam, financial results were achieved but in the impact was to the employee instead of the restaurant

  • • For participants who failed the certification exam, use of a price-driven sales strategy contributed to higher wine mix

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal