Sensitivity analyzes of the cost-effectiveness of a TTQ strategy
| Scenario | Incremental cost | Incremental QALYs | Cost-effectiveness ratio | Benefit-to-cost ratio (exc. health) | Benefit-to cost-ratio (inc. health) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | −52,386,318 € | 4,306 | Dominating | 7.0 | 19.4 |
| Positive testing rate (base case = 10%a) | |||||
| 5% | −21,834,780 € | 2,153 | Dominating | 3.5 | 9.7 |
| 15% | −82,937,857 € | 6,460 | Dominating | 10.5 | 29.0 |
| Number of close contacts (base case = 3b) | |||||
| 1 | −35,334,297 € | 3,105 | Dominating | 5.1 | 14.0 |
| 5 | −69,438,340 € | 5,508 | Dominating | 9.0 | 24.8 |
| Positive testing rate among close contacts (base case = 24%) | |||||
| 10% | −37,465,800 € | 3,255 | Dominating | 5.3 | 14.6 |
| 40% | −69,438,340 € | 5,508 | Dominating | 9.0 | 22.9 |
| % with potential for transmission by the time of detection (base case = 80%c) | |||||
| 60% | −30,167,018 € | 2,740 | Dominating | 4.5 | 12.3 |
| 90% | −63,495,969 € | 5,089 | Dominating | 8.3 | 22.9 |
| Adherence rate to isolation (base case = 75%c) | |||||
| 60% | −35,721,843 € | 3,132 | Dominating | 5.1 | 14.1 |
| 90% | −69,050,794 € | 5,481 | Dominating | 8.9 | 24.6 |
| Basic reproductive ratio (base case = 1d) | |||||
| 0.8 | −40,165,703 € | 3,445 | Dominating | 5.6 | 15.5 |
| 1.2 | −64,606,934 € | 5,168 | Dominating | 8.4 | 23.2 |
| Number of subsequent fortnights of transmissions (base case = 3e) | |||||
| 1 | − 11,650,934 € | 1,435 | Dominating | 2.3 | 6.5 |
| 5 | −93,121,703 € | 7,177 | Dominating | 11.7 | 32.3 |
| Cost per PCR test (base case = 40 €e) | |||||
| 20 € | −56,141,518 € | 4,306 | Dominating | 12.3 | 34.0 |
| 60 € | −48,631,118 € | 4,306 | Dominating | 4.9 | 13.5 |
| % of COVID-19 hospitalized cases suffering long-term consequences (base case = 33%e) | |||||
| 10% | −41,769,011 € | 2,271 | Dominating | 5.8 | 12.3 |
| 40% | −55,419,835 € | 4,888 | Dominating | 7.4 | 21.4 |
| Scenario | Incremental cost | Incremental QALYs | Cost-effectiveness ratio | Benefit-to-cost ratio (exc. health) | Benefit-to cost-ratio (inc. health) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | −52,386,318 € | 4,306 | Dominating | 7.0 | 19.4 |
| Positive testing rate (base case = 10%a) | |||||
| 5% | −21,834,780 € | 2,153 | Dominating | 3.5 | 9.7 |
| 15% | −82,937,857 € | 6,460 | Dominating | 10.5 | 29.0 |
| Number of close contacts (base case = 3b) | |||||
| 1 | −35,334,297 € | 3,105 | Dominating | 5.1 | 14.0 |
| 5 | −69,438,340 € | 5,508 | Dominating | 9.0 | 24.8 |
| Positive testing rate among close contacts (base case = 24%) | |||||
| 10% | −37,465,800 € | 3,255 | Dominating | 5.3 | 14.6 |
| 40% | −69,438,340 € | 5,508 | Dominating | 9.0 | 22.9 |
| % with potential for transmission by the time of detection (base case = 80%c) | |||||
| 60% | −30,167,018 € | 2,740 | Dominating | 4.5 | 12.3 |
| 90% | −63,495,969 € | 5,089 | Dominating | 8.3 | 22.9 |
| Adherence rate to isolation (base case = 75%c) | |||||
| 60% | −35,721,843 € | 3,132 | Dominating | 5.1 | 14.1 |
| 90% | −69,050,794 € | 5,481 | Dominating | 8.9 | 24.6 |
| Basic reproductive ratio (base case = 1d) | |||||
| 0.8 | −40,165,703 € | 3,445 | Dominating | 5.6 | 15.5 |
| 1.2 | −64,606,934 € | 5,168 | Dominating | 8.4 | 23.2 |
| Number of subsequent fortnights of transmissions (base case = 3e) | |||||
| 1 | − 11,650,934 € | 1,435 | Dominating | 2.3 | 6.5 |
| 5 | −93,121,703 € | 7,177 | Dominating | 11.7 | 32.3 |
| Cost per PCR test (base case = 40 €e) | |||||
| 20 € | −56,141,518 € | 4,306 | Dominating | 12.3 | 34.0 |
| 60 € | −48,631,118 € | 4,306 | Dominating | 4.9 | 13.5 |
| % of COVID-19 hospitalized cases suffering long-term consequences (base case = 33%e) | |||||
| 10% | −41,769,011 € | 2,271 | Dominating | 5.8 | 12.3 |
| 40% | −55,419,835 € | 4,888 | Dominating | 7.4 | 21.4 |
Notes:
aThis is an assumption based on positive testing rates between 9% and 12% in the first weeks of November 2020 as published daily by the Ministry of Health reports: www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/documentos/Actualizacion_254_COVID-19.pdf;
This is an assumption based on the median number of two contacts in the first weeks of November 2020 as published by the ISCIII weekly reports: www.isciii.es/QueHacemos/Servicios/VigilanciaSaludPublicaRENAVE/EnfermedadesTransmisibles/Documents/INFORMES/Informes%20COVID-19/Informe%20COVID-19.%20N%C2%BA%2053_18%20de%20noviembre%20de%202020.pdf;
This is an assumption based on the same value used by Cutler and Summers (2020).
This is an assumption based on the R0 numbers of the first weeks of November 2020 as published daily by the ISCIII: https://coronadatos.es/Evolucion/NumeroReproductivo/ESPA%C3%91A;
This is an assumption
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.