Table 6. Results of the FAHP ( n = 9,...

Table 6.

Results of the FAHP (n = 9, samples are cruise operators)

Criteria	Local weights	Sub-criteria	Local weights	Global weights	Rank
Port infrastructure and facilities	0.288	Berth facilities	0.287	0.083	4
		Navigation facilities	0.207	0.060	11
		Cruise terminal facilities	0.245	0.071	7
		Green terminal facilities	0.260	0.075	6
Port regulations and services	0.221	PSC	0.371	0.082	5
		Cruise service function	0.317	0.070	8
		Port charges	0.312	0.069	9
Port-city development plans	0.332	City’s history and culture	0.333	0.111	2
		Green port hinterland transport system	0.326	0.108	3
		Onshore tourism programme	0.341	0.113	1
Port geography and climate	0.158	Port location	0.316	0.050	12
		Port-city climate	0.279	0.044	13
		Natural resources	0.405	0.064	10

Criteria	Local weights	Sub-criteria	Local weights	Global weights	Rank
Port infrastructure and facilities	0.288	Berth facilities	0.287	0.083	4
		Navigation facilities	0.207	0.060	11
		Cruise terminal facilities	0.245	0.071	7
		Green terminal facilities	0.260	0.075	6
Port regulations and services	0.221	PSC	0.371	0.082	5
		Cruise service function	0.317	0.070	8
		Port charges	0.312	0.069	9
Port-city development plans	0.332	City’s history and culture	0.333	0.111	2
		Green port hinterland transport system	0.326	0.108	3
		Onshore tourism programme	0.341	0.113	1
Port geography and climate	0.158	Port location	0.316	0.050	12
		Port-city climate	0.279	0.044	13
		Natural resources	0.405	0.064	10

Notes:

The local weight of each criterion or sub-criterion is derived from expert judgement and pairwise comparison, the global weight of a sub-criterion is derived by multiplying the local weight of the sub-criterion by that of the corresponding criterion

[ViewLarge]