Table 7. Results of the FAHP ( n = 8,...

Table 7.

Results of the FAHP (n = 8, samples are governmental officials)

Criteria	Local weights	Sub-criteria	Local weights	Global weights	Rank
Port infrastructure and facilities	0.293	Berth facilities	0.267	0.078	4
		Navigation facilities	0.246	0.072	9
		Cruise terminal facilities	0.254	0.074	7
		Green terminal facilities	0.233	0.068	12
Port regulations and services	0.240	PSC	0.296	0.071	10
		Cruise service function	0.295	0.071	10
		Port charges	0.409	0.098	1
Port-city development plans	0.232	City’s history and culture	0.332	0.077	5
		Green port hinterland transport system	0.349	0.081	3
		Onshore tourism programme	0.320	0.074	7
Port geography and climate	0.235	Port location	0.415	0.098	1
		Port-city climate	0.317	0.075	6
		Natural resources	0.268	0.063	13

Criteria	Local weights	Sub-criteria	Local weights	Global weights	Rank
Port infrastructure and facilities	0.293	Berth facilities	0.267	0.078	4
		Navigation facilities	0.246	0.072	9
		Cruise terminal facilities	0.254	0.074	7
		Green terminal facilities	0.233	0.068	12
Port regulations and services	0.240	PSC	0.296	0.071	10
		Cruise service function	0.295	0.071	10
		Port charges	0.409	0.098	1
Port-city development plans	0.232	City’s history and culture	0.332	0.077	5
		Green port hinterland transport system	0.349	0.081	3
		Onshore tourism programme	0.320	0.074	7
Port geography and climate	0.235	Port location	0.415	0.098	1
		Port-city climate	0.317	0.075	6
		Natural resources	0.268	0.063	13

Notes:

The local weight of each criterion or sub-criterion is derived from expert judgement and pairwise comparison, the global weight of a sub-criterion is derived by multiplying the local weight of the sub-criterion by that of the corresponding criterion

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable