Table 8. Results of the FAHP ( n = 9,...

Table 8.

Results of the FAHP (n = 9, samples are academics)

Criteria	Local weights	Sub-criteria	Local weights	Global weights	Rank
Port infrastructure and facilities	0.275	Berth facilities	0.267	0.074	8
		Navigation facilities	0.249	0.069	9
		Cruise terminal facilities	0.245	0.067	10
		Green terminal facilities	0.239	0.066	12
Port regulations and services	0.226	PSC	0.351	0.079	5
		Cruise service function	0.278	0.063	13
		Port charges	0.371	0.084	3
Port-city development plans	0.225	City’s history and culture	0.332	0.075	7
		Green port hinterland transport system	0.298	0.067	10
		Onshore tourism programme	0.370	0.083	4
Port geography and climate	0.275	Port location	0.289	0.079	5
		Port-city climate	0.345	0.095	2
		Natural resources	0.366	0.100	1

Criteria	Local weights	Sub-criteria	Local weights	Global weights	Rank
Port infrastructure and facilities	0.275	Berth facilities	0.267	0.074	8
		Navigation facilities	0.249	0.069	9
		Cruise terminal facilities	0.245	0.067	10
		Green terminal facilities	0.239	0.066	12
Port regulations and services	0.226	PSC	0.351	0.079	5
		Cruise service function	0.278	0.063	13
		Port charges	0.371	0.084	3
Port-city development plans	0.225	City’s history and culture	0.332	0.075	7
		Green port hinterland transport system	0.298	0.067	10
		Onshore tourism programme	0.370	0.083	4
Port geography and climate	0.275	Port location	0.289	0.079	5
		Port-city climate	0.345	0.095	2
		Natural resources	0.366	0.100	1

Notes:

The local weight of each criterion or sub-criterion is derived from expert judgement and pairwise comparison, the global weight of a sub-criterion is derived by multiplying the local weight of the sub-criterion by that of the corresponding criterion

[ViewLarge]