Inside the model
| B | Wald | df | Sig | Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age* | 6.621 | 4 | 0.157 | ||
| 26–35 | 0.840 | 0.871 | 1 | 0.351 | 2.316 |
| 36–45 | −0.195 | 0.048 | 1 | 0.827 | 0.822 |
| 46–55 | 0.199 | 0.047 | 1 | 0.829 | 1.220 |
| 56 or above | −0.448 | 0.214 | 1 | 0.644 | 0.639 |
| Gender (0 = males, 1 = females) | −0.748 | 3.654 | 1 | 0.056 | 0.473 |
| Education** | 4.765 | 3 | 0.190 | ||
| Secondary or 2 years above secondary | −0.994 | 0.976 | 1 | 0.323 | 0.370 |
| Bachelor's degree | −1.254 | 1.611 | 1 | 0.204 | 0.285 |
| Master's or PhD | −1.936 | 3.410 | 1 | 0.065 | 0.144 |
| Internet illiteracy | −0.555 | 1.214 | 1 | 0.271 | 0.574 |
| Index political awareness | 0.349 | 1.657 | 1 | 0.198 | 1.418 |
| Social empowerment | 0.532 | 0.958 | 1 | 0.328 | 1.703 |
| Perception of rule of law and law enforcement*** (what happens in case of reporting a corrupt official) | 1.634 | 3 | 0.652 | ||
| Nothing | −0.231 | 0.265 | 1 | 0.606 | 0.794 |
| Official will be punished after long time litigation | −0.474 | 0.793 | 1 | 0.373 | 0.622 |
| Official will be punished directly | −0.859 | 1.293 | 1 | 0.255 | 0.424 |
| Using a mediator | 1.523 | 13.208 | 1 | 0.000 | 4.584 |
| Number of officials | 0.015 | 0.021 | 1 | 0.884 | 1.015 |
| Competition in public service | −0.217 | 0.420 | 1 | 0.517 | 0.805 |
| Number of official documents and requirements | 0.061 | 0.554 | 1 | 0.457 | 1.063 |
| Index define as corruption | −0.167 | 1.021 | 1 | 0.312 | 0.846 |
| Acceptance of petty corruption | 1.036 | 9.302 | 1 | 0.002 | 2.819 |
| Index perceived prevalence | 0.466 | 3.024 | 1 | 0.082 | 1.594 |
| Index perceived bribe effect | 0.275 | 0.590 | 1 | 0.442 | 1.316 |
| Previous petty corruption experience | 2.210 | 25.716 | 1 | 0.000 | 9.119 |
| Index probability and severity of punishment | −0.197 | 1.090 | 1 | 0.296 | 0.821 |
| Index intent of corruption | 0.610 | 2.713 | 1 | 0.100 | 1.840 |
| Index circumstantial influences | −0.325 | 0.908 | 1 | 0.341 | 0.722 |
| Wald | df | Sig | Exp( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age* | 6.621 | 4 | 0.157 | ||
| 26–35 | 0.840 | 0.871 | 1 | 0.351 | 2.316 |
| 36–45 | −0.195 | 0.048 | 1 | 0.827 | 0.822 |
| 46–55 | 0.199 | 0.047 | 1 | 0.829 | 1.220 |
| 56 or above | −0.448 | 0.214 | 1 | 0.644 | 0.639 |
| Gender (0 = males, 1 = females) | −0.748 | 3.654 | 1 | 0.056 | 0.473 |
| Education** | 4.765 | 3 | 0.190 | ||
| Secondary or 2 years above secondary | −0.994 | 0.976 | 1 | 0.323 | 0.370 |
| Bachelor's degree | −1.254 | 1.611 | 1 | 0.204 | 0.285 |
| Master's or PhD | −1.936 | 3.410 | 1 | 0.065 | 0.144 |
| Internet illiteracy | −0.555 | 1.214 | 1 | 0.271 | 0.574 |
| Index political awareness | 0.349 | 1.657 | 1 | 0.198 | 1.418 |
| Social empowerment | 0.532 | 0.958 | 1 | 0.328 | 1.703 |
| Perception of rule of law and law enforcement*** (what happens in case of reporting a corrupt official) | 1.634 | 3 | 0.652 | ||
| Nothing | −0.231 | 0.265 | 1 | 0.606 | 0.794 |
| Official will be punished after long time litigation | −0.474 | 0.793 | 1 | 0.373 | 0.622 |
| Official will be punished directly | −0.859 | 1.293 | 1 | 0.255 | 0.424 |
| Using a mediator | 1.523 | 13.208 | 1 | 0.000 | 4.584 |
| Number of officials | 0.015 | 0.021 | 1 | 0.884 | 1.015 |
| Competition in public service | −0.217 | 0.420 | 1 | 0.517 | 0.805 |
| Number of official documents and requirements | 0.061 | 0.554 | 1 | 0.457 | 1.063 |
| Index define as corruption | −0.167 | 1.021 | 1 | 0.312 | 0.846 |
| Acceptance of petty corruption | 1.036 | 9.302 | 1 | 0.002 | 2.819 |
| Index perceived prevalence | 0.466 | 3.024 | 1 | 0.082 | 1.594 |
| Index perceived bribe effect | 0.275 | 0.590 | 1 | 0.442 | 1.316 |
| Previous petty corruption experience | 2.210 | 25.716 | 1 | 0.000 | 9.119 |
| Index probability and severity of punishment | −0.197 | 1.090 | 1 | 0.296 | 0.821 |
| Index intent of corruption | 0.610 | 2.713 | 1 | 0.100 | 1.840 |
| Index circumstantial influences | −0.325 | 0.908 | 1 | 0.341 | 0.722 |
Note(s): Dependent variable “paid a bribe during last transaction with Authority A”
*Reference category first “18–25”
**Reference category first “preparatory education or below”
***Reference category first “reporter will be harmed”
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.