Public perceptions of the CPIB's effectiveness in curbing corruption, 2013 and 2016
| Survey item | Percentage of respondents agreeing with statement | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2016 | Change | |
| Positive evaluation of Singapore's anti-corruption efforts | 91% | 89% | −2% |
| The CPIB is effective in maintaining Singapore's low level of corruption | 77% | 78% | +1% |
| The CPIB has done well in solving corruption cases | 73% | 76% | +3% |
| The CPIB is impartial in its investigations | 67% | 71% | +4% |
| The CPIB can be trusted to keep Singapore corruption free | 73% | 71% | −2% |
| Total number of respondents | 1,016 | 1,001 | -- |
| Survey item | Percentage of respondents agreeing with statement | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2016 | Change | |
| Positive evaluation of Singapore's anti-corruption efforts | 91% | 89% | −2% |
| The CPIB is effective in maintaining Singapore's low level of corruption | 77% | 78% | +1% |
| The CPIB has done well in solving corruption cases | 73% | 76% | +3% |
| The CPIB is impartial in its investigations | 67% | 71% | +4% |
| The CPIB can be trusted to keep Singapore corruption free | 73% | 71% | −2% |
| Total number of respondents | 1,016 | 1,001 | -- |
Sources: Compiled from CPIB (2017a, pp. 9-10) and the 2013 CPIB's public perceptions survey findings provided by the CPIB