Table IV HLM regression of... | Emerald Publishing

Table IV

HLM regression of employee-rated contextual performance on job insecurity and moderators (Model 2)

	Moderator: intrinsic motivation				Moderator: distributive justice
	OCB-I		OCB-O		OCB-I		OCB-O
Variable	Coefficient	SE	Coefficient	SE	Coefficient	SE	Coefficient	SE
Intercept γ₀₀	3.492**	0.073	3.366**	0.067	3.488**	0.075	3.363**	0.060
Job insecurity (JI) γ₁₀	0.198**	0.064	0.069	0.060	0.196**	0.064	0.085	0.063
Moderator (IM or DJ) γ₂₀	0.280**	0.107	0.370**	0.101	−0.101	0.077	−0.102	0.076
JI × moderator γ₃₀	−0.090^a	0.109	−0.034^b	0.103	−0.180**^,c	0.062	−0.142*^,d	0.061
Organizational support γ₄₀	0.078	0.098	0.075	0.093	0.132	0.108	0.137	0.106
Job satisfaction γ₅₀	0.486**	0.116	0.291**	0.109	0.566**	0.113	0.375**	0.112
−2 log-likelihood	189.794		177.516		188.536		184.267

	Moderator: intrinsic motivation				Moderator: distributive justice
	OCB-I		OCB-O		OCB-I		OCB-O
Variable	Coefficient	SE	Coefficient	SE	Coefficient	SE	Coefficient	SE
Intercept γ₀₀	3.492**	0.073	3.366**	0.067	3.488**	0.075	3.363**	0.060
Job insecurity (JI) γ₁₀	0.198**	0.064	0.069	0.060	0.196**	0.064	0.085	0.063
Moderator (IM or DJ) γ₂₀	0.280**	0.107	0.370**	0.101	−0.101	0.077	−0.102	0.076
JI × moderator γ₃₀	−0.090^a	0.109	−0.034^b	0.103	−0.180**^,c	0.062	−0.142*^,d	0.061
Organizational support γ₄₀	0.078	0.098	0.075	0.093	0.132	0.108	0.137	0.106
Job satisfaction γ₅₀	0.486**	0.116	0.291**	0.109	0.566**	0.113	0.375**	0.112
−2 log-likelihood	189.794		177.516		188.536		184.267

Notes: n=103. ^aInteraction coefficient in Model 1: −0.186 and in Model 3: −0.131; ^binteraction coefficient in Model 1: −0.091 and in Model 3: −0.076; ^cinteraction coefficient in Model 1: −0.172** and in Model 3: −0.148**; ^dinteraction coefficient in Model 1: −0.138* and in Model 3: −0.131. *p<0.05; **p<0.01

[ViewLarge]