Comparisons over time using generalized estimating equations to evaluate the effect of the Dual Approach Program on parents’ sexual communication behaviors
| Variables | Baseline µ (SD) | Posttest µ (SD) | β | SE | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual communication behavior of parents | ||||||
| Week 9 | ||||||
| Group 1 (Control) | 8.03 (3.32) | 7.83 (3.54) | – | – | – | – |
| Group 2 (AP) | 7.98 (3.75) | 7.93 (3.30) | 0.15 | 1.04 | [−1.88, 2.18] | 0.890 |
| Group 3 (APP) | 6.95 (3.82) | 9.60 (2.46) | 2.84 | 1.00 | [0.89, 4.80] | 0.004** |
| Variables | Baseline | Posttest | SE | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 9 | ||||||
| Group 1 (Control) | 8.03 (3.32) | 7.83 (3.54) | – | – | – | – |
| Group 2 (AP) | 7.98 (3.75) | 7.93 (3.30) | 0.15 | 1.04 | [−1.88, 2.18] | 0.890 |
| Group 3 (APP) | 6.95 (3.82) | 9.60 (2.46) | 2.84 | 1.00 | [0.89, 4.80] | 0.004** |
Notes: AP, Adolescent Program; APP, Adolescent Parent Program; β, unstandardized beta coefficient; CI, confidence interval. **p<0.01
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.