Table III

Comparisons at Week 5 using generalized estimating equations to evaluate the effect of the Dual Approach Program on adolescents’ sexual abstinence cognition scores using the control group at baseline as the reference scores

VariablesBaseline µ (SD)Week 5 µ (SD)βSE95% CIp-value
Attitude
Group 1102.18 (19.16)116.30 (29.89)
Group 2 (AP)109.60 (14.95)125.23 (22.64)1.505.68[−9.63, 12.63]0.792
Group 3 (APP)102.19 (18.33)126.88 (23.66)10.5735.50[−0.21, 21.34]0.055
Subjective norm
Group 177.83 (40.33)80.80 (36.75)
Group 2 (AP)75.73 (24.98)98.83 (26.89)15.1310.06[−4.60, 38.84]0.133
Group 3 (APP)75.36 (26.81)108.14 (35.75)29.819.94[10.33, 49.29]0.003**
Perceived behavioral control
Group 172.18 (31.75)70.10 (29.24)
Group 2 (AP)69.38 (31.24)81.23 (33.95)13.935.77[2.62, 25.23]0.016*
Group 3 (APP)72.26 (26.90)92 (26.22)21.815.53[10.98, 32.65]<0.001**
Intention
Group 172.69 (19.84)75.06 (17.72) 
Group 2 (AP)74.06 (12.28)82.17 (12.23)5.733.32[−0.78, 12.24]0.084
Group 3 (APP)72.05 (17.74)87.02 (13.23)12.603.89[4.97, 20.23]0.001**

Notes: AP, Adolescent Program; APP, Adolescent Parent Program; β, unstandardized beta coefficient; CI, confidence interval. *p<0.05; **p<0.01

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options