Table IV

Comparisons at Week 9 using generalized estimating equations to evaluate the effect of the Dual Approach Program on adolescents’ sexual abstinence cognition scores using the control group as the reference

VariablesBaseline µ (SD)Week 9 µ (SD)βSE95% CIp-value
Attitude
Group 1102.18 (19.16)118.82 (30.79) 
Group 2 (AP)109.60 (14.95)130.00 (21.70)3.755.93[−7.87, 15.37]0.527
Group 3 (APP)102.19 (18.33)129.50 (22.03)10.665.76[−0.62, 21.94]0.064
Subjective norm
Group 177.83 (40.33)77.88 (26.81) 
Group 2 (AP)75.73 (24.98)91.83 (35.75)16.0510.06[−3.67, 35.77]0.111
Group 3 (APP)75.36 (26.81)109.69 (36.68)34.289.94[14.81, 53.76]0.001**
Perceived behavioral control
Group 172.18 (31.75)69.10 (26.90)
Group 2 (AP)69.38 (31.24)80.63 (33.60)14.335.69[3.33, 25.32]0.011*
Group 3 (APP)72.26 (26.90)94.50 (27.66)25.315.47[14.59, 36.04]<0.001**
Intention
Group 172.69 (19.84)74.90 (17.74) 
Group 2 (AP)74.06 (12.28)82.90 (12.25)6.863.30[0.12, 13.06]0.046*
Group 3 (APP)72.05 (17.74)87.44 (13.47)13.143.93[5.44, 20.85]0.001**

Notes: AP, Adolescent Program; APP, Adolescent Parent Program; β, unstandardized beta coefficient; CI, confidence interval. *p<0.05; **p<0.01

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options