Table 1 Descriptive statistics and...

Table 1

Descriptive statistics and correlation between all study variables

Scale	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1. TFL T1	60.63	19.54	(0.91)
2. TFL T2	63.10	18.90	0.50**	(0.92)
3. Collective self-eff T1	80.26	18.60	0.26**	0.11	(0.92)
4. Collective self-eff T2	76.70	20.35	0.19**	0.38**	0.38**	(0.94)
5. Transfer	53.85	13.89	0.05	0.20**	–0.04	0.12*	(0.75)
6. Learning	2.75	0.78	0.03	0.12*	0.02	0.11	0.76**	(0.88)
7. Utility	2.19	0.10	–0.02	–0.02	0.25**	0.19**	0.27**	0.02	(0.79)
8. Support	2.47	0.71	0.13*	0.16**	0.10	0.20**	0.31**	–0.13**	0.30**	(0.77)

Scale	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1. TFL T1	60.63	19.54	(0.91)
2. TFL T2	63.10	18.90	0.50**	(0.92)
3. Collective self-eff T1	80.26	18.60	0.26**	0.11	(0.92)
4. Collective self-eff T2	76.70	20.35	0.19**	0.38**	0.38**	(0.94)
5. Transfer	53.85	13.89	0.05	0.20**	–0.04	0.12*	(0.75)
6. Learning	2.75	0.78	0.03	0.12*	0.02	0.11	0.76**	(0.88)
7. Utility	2.19	0.10	–0.02	–0.02	0.25**	0.19**	0.27**	0.02	(0.79)
8. Support	2.47	0.71	0.13*	0.16**	0.10	0.20**	0.31**	–0.13**	0.30**	(0.77)

Note(s): N = 298 followers working with 36 leaders; for correlations between follower data and leader data, leader values were disaggregated to each follower. Internal consistency reliabilities are on the diagonal, in parentheses. TFL = Transformational leadership. The TFL, collective self-efficacy and transfer scales were transformed to facilitate interpretation, so they ranged from 0 to 100 with 100 representing a high score on the construct; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

[ViewLarge]