Table 4 Summary of best-fit... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4

Summary of best-fit idealisations with BM as two subunits

Model property	SP-1 (Scenario G)	SP-13 (Scenario D)	SP-17 (Scenario E)
Top subunit of BM
Top	93.03 ft (28.37 m)	99.82 ft (30.45 m)	98.43 ft (30.02 m)
Thickness: m	4.50	6.5	6.0
Crust	None	None	None
NCL	$e = 4.45 - 1.16 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 4.40 - 1.15 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 4.40 - 1.15 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$
OCR or p _c	$p_{c} = 1.05 σ_{v}^{'} + 9 kPa$	1.05	$p_{c} = 1.15 σ_{v}^{'} + 17 kPa$
c _v: m²/year	0.95	0.90	1.00
Creep	C_α = 0.05	C_α = 0.05	C_α = 0.05
Bottom subunit of BM
Top	78.23 ft (23.86 m)	78.42 ft (23.92 m)	78.75 ft (24.02 m)
Thickness: m	10.74	5.08	7.41
NCL	$e = 3.6 - 0.90 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 3.57 - 0.90 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 3.60 - 0.90 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$
OCR or p _c	$p_{c} = 1.05 σ_{v}^{'} + 9 kPa$	1.05	$p_{c} = 1.25 σ_{v}^{'} + 17 kPa$
c _v: m²/year	1.70	1.80	1.80
Creep	C_α = 0.05	C_α = 0.04	C_α = 0.04

Model property	SP-1 (Scenario G)	SP-13 (Scenario D)	SP-17 (Scenario E)
Top subunit of BM
Top	93.03 ft (28.37 m)	99.82 ft (30.45 m)	98.43 ft (30.02 m)
Thickness: m	4.50	6.5	6.0
Crust	None	None	None
NCL	$e = 4.45 - 1.16 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 4.40 - 1.15 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 4.40 - 1.15 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$
OCR or p _c	$p_{c} = 1.05 σ_{v}^{'} + 9 kPa$	1.05	$p_{c} = 1.15 σ_{v}^{'} + 17 kPa$
c _v: m²/year	0.95	0.90	1.00
Creep	C_α = 0.05	C_α = 0.05	C_α = 0.05
Bottom subunit of BM
Top	78.23 ft (23.86 m)	78.42 ft (23.92 m)	78.75 ft (24.02 m)
Thickness: m	10.74	5.08	7.41
NCL	$e = 3.6 - 0.90 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 3.57 - 0.90 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$	$e = 3.60 - 0.90 \log (σ_{v}^{'})$
OCR or p _c	$p_{c} = 1.05 σ_{v}^{'} + 9 kPa$	1.05	$p_{c} = 1.25 σ_{v}^{'} + 17 kPa$
c _v: m²/year	1.70	1.80	1.80
Creep	C_α = 0.05	C_α = 0.04	C_α = 0.04

Note: top elevations (HBI datum) and stratum thicknesses are initial values