Table 3

Perception of learners from Kashmir Division and Jammu Division on major components of LSS (n = 300 from each division)

S.No.Parameters/Statement on components of LSS and its effectivenessStrongly agree + agree (SA + A)Neutral (N)Disagree + Strongly disagree (DA + SDA)
Jammu divisionKashmir divisionJammu divisionKashmir divisionJammu divisionKashmir division
Frequency (%)Frequency (%)Frequency (%)Frequency (%)Frequency (%)Frequency (%)
1Induction programme was useful197(65)217(72)49(16)39(13)54(18)44(15)
2SLM was delivered timely164(55)165(55)61(20)69(23)75(25)66(22)
3Evaluation of assignment done on time211(71)213(71)21(07)34(12)68(22)53(17)
4Feedback on assignment was useful166(56)185(62)61(20)57(19)73(24)58(19)
5Counselling sessions conducted regularly171(57)179(60)56(19)65(22)73(24)56(18)
6Counselling sessions conducted by qualified tutors184(61)197(66)66(22)62(21)50(17)41(13)
7Counselling sessions helped in grasping SLM contents212(71)211(70)40(13)52(17)48(16)37(13)
8Academic problems were solved by RCs/LSCs174(58)174(58)51(17)58(19)75(25)68(23)
9Administrative issues were resolved by RCs/LSCs154(51)158(53)64(22)73(24)82(27)69(23)
10Queries were addressed promptly by support staff140(47)145(48)77(26)75(25)83(27)80(27)
11Assessment and evaluation process was satisfactory164(55)180(60)92(31)80(27)44(14)40(13)
12Results were declared on time and course completed on time186(62)182(61)37(12)47(16)77(26)71(23)
Overall results (average of 12 components in %, figures rounded off))59%61%19%20%22%19%

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options