Table 4. Hypothesis testing Hypotheses...

Table 4.

Hypothesis testing

Hypotheses	Relationships	Path coefficients	t-Statistics	R²	Q²	p-Values	Decision
Direct effect
H1	IQSM → RSM	0.209	3.626**			0.001**	Supported
H2	IQSM → T	0.323	5.737**			0.001**	Supported
H3	RSM → T	0.144	2.281**			0.023**	Supported
H4	IQSM → PI	0.009	0.095^ns			0.924^ns	Not supported
H5	SMPMA → T	0.372	5.229**			0.001**	Supported
H6	SMPMA → PI	0.268	4.497**			0.001**	Supported
H7	T → PI	0.284	5.330**			0.001**	Supported
Indirect effect
	IQSM → RSM → T	0.040	2.018**			0.002**	Supported
	IQSM → T → PI	0.092	4.247**			0.001**	Supported
	SMPMA → T → PI	0.106	3.157**			0.002**	Supported
	RSM			0.144	0.024
	T			0.283	0.149
	PI			0.211	0.103
Total effect
	IQSM → RSM	0.209	3.416**			0.001**
	IQSM → T	0.363	6.527**			0.001**
	RSM → T	0.144	2.290**			0.022**
	IQSM → PI	0.101	1.112**			0.266^ns
	SMPMA → T	0.372	5.652**			0.001**
	SMPMA → PI	0.374	5.908**			0.001**
	T → PI	0.284	5.136**			0.001**

Hypotheses	Relationships	Path coefficients	t-Statistics	R²	Q²	p-Values	Decision
Direct effect
H1	IQSM → RSM	0.209	3.626**			0.001**	Supported
H2	IQSM → T	0.323	5.737**			0.001**	Supported
H3	RSM → T	0.144	2.281**			0.023**	Supported
H4	IQSM → PI	0.009	0.095^ns			0.924^ns	Not supported
H5	SMPMA → T	0.372	5.229**			0.001**	Supported
H6	SMPMA → PI	0.268	4.497**			0.001**	Supported
H7	T → PI	0.284	5.330**			0.001**	Supported
Indirect effect
	IQSM → RSM → T	0.040	2.018**			0.002**	Supported
	IQSM → T → PI	0.092	4.247**			0.001**	Supported
	SMPMA → T → PI	0.106	3.157**			0.002**	Supported
	RSM			0.144	0.024
	T			0.283	0.149
	PI			0.211	0.103
Total effect
	IQSM → RSM	0.209	3.416**			0.001**
	IQSM → T	0.363	6.527**			0.001**
	RSM → T	0.144	2.290**			0.022**
	IQSM → PI	0.101	1.112**			0.266^ns
	SMPMA → T	0.372	5.652**			0.001**
	SMPMA → PI	0.374	5.908**			0.001**
	T → PI	0.284	5.136**			0.001**

Notes:

**statistically significant at the 5%; ^nsnot significant. The rule of thumb for R² values is as follows: 0.75 for the strong category; 0.50 for the moderate category and 0.25 for the weak category. The rule of thumb value for Q² > 0 indicates that the model has predictive relevance and the rule of thumb for Q² < 0 indicates that the model lacks predictive relevance

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable