Table IV.

Categories and elements of analysis

CategoriesElements of analysisReferences
Collaboration between Brazilian DHs and its partnersObjective of the partnership: develop new products, obtain financial resources, qualified labor, etc
Kinds of partnership agreement and reasons that led the company to use them
Biazzi, 2012, Bönte & Keilbach (2005), Camboim (2015), Chesbrough (2011, 2012), Faccin & Balestrin (2015), Faccin et al. (2016a), Han et al. (2018), Janeiro et al. (2013), Kapoor & Mcgrath (2014), Oliveira & Balestrin (2015), Pénin et al. (2011), Rasiah et al. (2016), Simard & West (2011), Striukova & Rayna (2015), Sydow & Müller-Seitz, 2019), Tidd et al. (2008) and Vanhaverbeke (2011) 
Protection of IPPatents registry by companies for IP protection
Process of registering patents in Brazil
Campanario et al. (2009), Chesbrough (2011), Holgersson & Granstrand, (2017), INPI (2017), Jungmann & Bonetti (2010), Law no. 11,484 (Law no. 11,484/2007), Pénin et al. (2011) and Sikimic et al. (2016) 
Government policies to support the industryAvailability of public resources by development agencies
policies developed by the Brazilian Government to promote the industry of microelectronics: PNM and PADIS
Evaluation of the Programa CI-Brasil
ABDI (2011, 2014), ABISEMI (2018), Breier et al. (2013), Campanario et al. (2009), Faccin et al. (2016a, 2016b), Law no. 11,484 (Law no. 11,484/2007), Motta & Maia (2015); PNM (MCT, 2002), Salerno & Daher, (2006), Programa CI-Brasil (2019), Rasiah et al. (2016), Wu et al. (2019) 
Future of microelectronics in BrazilThe future of microelectronics in Brazil
Recommendations for the improvement of the industry and for Brazilian DHs
ABDI (2011, 2014), ABISEMI (2018, 2019a)
Source: Prepared by the authors based on the literature (2019)

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal