Qualitative analysis of datab
| Step | Task | Operationalization | Theoretical foundation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data reduction | Separation of elements | The data of the interview were separated according to categories (e.g. UDP, the presence of expressions and flows of tacit knowledge) | Represents the separation of segments or units, in this case, depending on the subject (Flores, 1994) |
| Identification and classification of the elements | Codes have been assigned to each data category, with abbreviations of words by using three letters | The category is a mental construct in which the content of each unit can be compared to determine if it belongs or not to this category (Flores, 1994) | |
| Grouping | Corresponding elements were grouped under defined categories | Through categorization, different data units are located under the same topic; that is, the same group (Flores, 1994) | |
| Disposition of data | Transformations and disposition | Data were expressed through: mental maps of people about UDP; contingency tables (to relate the incidence of moments from the use of TK); arrays that are related, not necessarily quantitative variables; diagrams; descriptive texts | Transformation refers to the presentation of data in a language or form of expression. “Disposition is an organized set of information, presented in some special order, that allows you to conclude” (Flores, 1994, p. 53) |
| Attainment and verification of the findings | Extraction of conclusions | From the available data, the meanings that survey respondents attach to their UDP practices and their relationship to the TK were identified | Conclusions are joined with developed ideas, achieving the synthesis that corresponds to the wording in the introduction (Galliano, 1986). Conclusions must fit into different elements in the analytical process, to rebuild a structured and meaningful whole (Flores, 1994) |
| Verification of findings | Conclusions went through validation with some participants | To verify the conclusions of a study means to prove their reliabilitya (Flores, 1994) |
| Step | Task | Operationalization | Theoretical foundation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data reduction | Separation of elements | The data of the interview were separated according to categories (e.g. UDP, the presence of expressions and flows of tacit knowledge) | Represents the separation of segments or units, in this case, depending on the subject ( |
| Identification and classification of the elements | Codes have been assigned to each data category, with abbreviations of words by using three letters | The category is a mental construct in which the content of each unit can be compared to determine if it belongs or not to this category ( | |
| Grouping | Corresponding elements were grouped under defined categories | Through categorization, different data units are located under the same topic; that is, the same group ( | |
| Disposition of data | Transformations | Data were expressed through: | Transformation refers to the presentation of data in a language or form of expression. “Disposition is an organized set of information, presented in some special order, that allows you to conclude” ( |
| Attainment and verification of the findings | Extraction of conclusions | From the available data, the meanings that survey respondents attach to their UDP practices and their relationship to the TK were identified | Conclusions are joined with developed ideas, achieving the synthesis that corresponds to the wording in the introduction ( |
| Verification of findings | Conclusions went through validation with some participants | To verify the conclusions of a study means to prove their reliabilitya ( |
Notes:
aThe term validity is appropriate to research quantitative in nature (Flores (1994);
bTo assist in the processing and analysis of data, the NVivo® software was used
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.