Discriminant validity using HTMT ratio
| Constructs | MHE | MNO | MLC | MRE | MME | MIN | MKN | SAT | INT | WOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHE | ||||||||||
| MNO | 0.833 | |||||||||
| MLC | 0.485 | 0.738 | ||||||||
| MRE | 0.570 | 0.726 | 0.767 | |||||||
| MME | 0.560 | 0.632 | 0.495 | 0.805 | ||||||
| MIN | 0.512 | 0.666 | 0.683 | 0.714 | 0.637 | |||||
| MKN | 0.524 | 0.627 | 0.576 | 0.673 | 0.845 | 0.771 | ||||
| SAT | 0.415 | 0.597 | 0.674 | 0.557 | 0.425 | 0.852 | 0.608 | |||
| INT | 0.427 | 0.592 | 0.699 | 0.596 | 0.538 | 0.730 | 0.653 | 0.821 | ||
| WOM | 0.437 | 0.556 | 0.466 | 0.508 | 0.480 | 0.513 | 0.506 | 0.543 | 0.710 |
| Constructs | MHE | MNO | MLC | MRE | MME | MIN | MKN | SAT | INT | WOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHE | ||||||||||
| MNO | 0.833 | |||||||||
| MLC | 0.485 | 0.738 | ||||||||
| MRE | 0.570 | 0.726 | 0.767 | |||||||
| MME | 0.560 | 0.632 | 0.495 | 0.805 | ||||||
| MIN | 0.512 | 0.666 | 0.683 | 0.714 | 0.637 | |||||
| MKN | 0.524 | 0.627 | 0.576 | 0.673 | 0.845 | 0.771 | ||||
| SAT | 0.415 | 0.597 | 0.674 | 0.557 | 0.425 | 0.852 | 0.608 | |||
| INT | 0.427 | 0.592 | 0.699 | 0.596 | 0.538 | 0.730 | 0.653 | 0.821 | ||
| WOM | 0.437 | 0.556 | 0.466 | 0.508 | 0.480 | 0.513 | 0.506 | 0.543 | 0.710 |
Notes:
Hedonism = MHE; Novelty = MNO; Local culture = MLC; Refreshment = MRE; Meaningfulness = MME; Involvement = MIN; Knowledge = MKN; Satisfaction = SAT; Revisit Intention = RINT; Word-of-mouth intention = WOM
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.