Post-hoc analysis: main effect between key influencers and invisible users
| Variables | Number of subtracted followers ≤25th percentile | Number of subtracted followers ≥75th percentile | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio (SE) | p-value | Hazard ratio (SE) | p-value | |
| Gender | 0.35(0.52) | 0.481 | 0.33(0.16) | 0.019* |
| Social unrest | 27.73(211.75) | 0.664 | 1.02(0.61) | 0.969 |
| SEZ | 0.00(230.23) | 1.000 | 1.82(1.46) | 0.456 |
| Coastal_open_city | 0.00(0.00) | 1.000 | 1.90(0.96) | 0.204 |
| GDP Growth Rate | 1.01(0.37) | 0.976 | 1.04(0.11) | 0.709 |
| Num_unemployed | 1.00(0.00) | 0.047* | 1.00(0.00) | 0.676 |
| Num_hosp | 1.00(0.01) | 0.648 | 1.00(0.00) | 0.016* |
| Num_bus | 1.00(0.00) | 0.382 | 1.00(0.00) | 0.690 |
| Constant | 0.00(0.00) | 0.011* | 0.00(0.00) | 0.000*** |
| Clustered by Province IDs | Yes | Yes | ||
| Year dummies | Included | Included | ||
| Log likelihood | −8.51 | −55.47 | ||
| Wald Chi-square | 20.40 | 71.41 | ||
| N | 125 | 137 | ||
| Variables | Number of subtracted followers ≤25th percentile | Number of subtracted followers ≥75th percentile | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio (SE) | Hazard ratio (SE) | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Social unrest | 27.73(211.75) | 0.664 | 1.02(0.61) | 0.969 |
| SEZ | 0.00(230.23) | 1.000 | 1.82(1.46) | 0.456 |
| Coastal_open_city | 0.00(0.00) | 1.000 | 1.90(0.96) | 0.204 |
| GDP Growth Rate | 1.01(0.37) | 0.976 | 1.04(0.11) | 0.709 |
| Num_unemployed | 1.00(0.00) | 0.047* | 1.00(0.00) | 0.676 |
| Num_hosp | 1.00(0.01) | 0.648 | 1.00(0.00) | 0.016* |
| Num_bus | 1.00(0.00) | 0.382 | 1.00(0.00) | 0.690 |
| Constant | 0.00(0.00) | 0.011* | 0.00(0.00) | 0.000*** |
| Clustered by Province IDs | Yes | Yes | ||
| Year dummies | Included | Included | ||
| Log likelihood | −8.51 | −55.47 | ||
| Wald Chi-square | 20.40 | 71.41 | ||
| 125 | 137 | |||
Note(s): The hazard rate of engaging in the very first live-streaming activity is the dependent variable. We report odds ratios, standard errors (SE), and p values. Odds ratios are interpreted as the proportional change in hazard rate from a one-unit increase in the predictor of interest. The value of one indicates no change. The values less than one suggest that increases in predictors of interest decrease the hazard rate, and those greater than one denote that increases in predictors of interest increase the hazard rate
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Source(s): Table by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.