Summary of existing studies on the effects of plants on SWRC
| Plant species | Soil type | Dry density: Mg/m3 | Observed plant effects | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange jasmine (Murraya paniculata); vetiver grass (Chrysopgon zizanioides) | Poorly graded sand (SP) | 1·31 | Water retention capacity increased in both vegetated soils | Rahardjo et al. (2014) |
| Ivy tree (Schefflera heptaphylla) | Silty sand (SM) | 1·49 | Vegetated soil has higher air-entry value (AEV) but similar desorption rate, compared with bare soil | Leung et al. (2015) |
| Ivy tree (Schefflera heptaphylla) | Silty sand (SM) | 1·78 | Water retention capacity increased at intermediate (e.g. 120 mm) and wide plant spacing (e.g. 180 mm), but it reduced at close plant spacing (e.g. 60 mm). | Ng et al. (2016a) |
| Vetiver grass (Chrysopgon zizanioides) | Low-plasticity silt (ML) | 1·31 | AEV increased with root biomass but then decreased after a certain threshold root biomass | Jotisankasa & Sirirattanachat (2017) |
| Plant species | Soil type | Dry density: Mg/m3 | Observed plant effects | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange jasmine ( | Poorly graded sand (SP) | 1·31 | Water retention capacity increased in both vegetated soils | |
| Ivy tree ( | Silty sand (SM) | 1·49 | Vegetated soil has higher air-entry value (AEV) but similar desorption rate, compared with bare soil | |
| Ivy tree | Silty sand (SM) | 1·78 | Water retention capacity increased at intermediate (e.g. 120 mm) and wide plant spacing (e.g. 180 mm), but it reduced at close plant spacing (e.g. 60 mm). | |
| Vetiver grass ( | Low-plasticity silt (ML) | 1·31 | AEV increased with root biomass but then decreased after a certain threshold root biomass |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.