Table 6.

ARDL bound tests and ECT for RGDPG, SMI1 and SMI2

Long run relationship, ARDL and bound tests results 
 RGDPGSMI1SMI2
RGDPG 0.222349−0.337290***
SMI11.139416*** 0.395901***
SMI2−0.954387***−0.020214 
Bound tests F-value12.29329***1.4768189.544598***
k = 210%5%1%
Finite sample: n = 70I (0)3.253.9475.487
 I (1)4.2375.026.88
Short run and error correction form [ECT] 
 ARDL (1, 0, 0)ARDL (1, 0, 1)ARDL (1, 1, 1)
 RGDPGSMI1SMI2
ΔRGDPG 0.020781−0.071348**
ΔRGDPG (−1)0.264906** −0.109312***
ΔSMI10.837578*** 1.015911***
ΔSM1(−1) 0.906537***−0.803857***
ΔSMI2−0.701564***0.218853*** 
ΔSMI2(−1) −0.220743***0.464378**
C4.091239***−0.0971050.969978***
ECT(t − 1) [Coeff.]
Test [Value]
−0.735094***
[−6.160264]***
−0.093463**
[−2.135594]
−0.535622***
[−5.430335]***
R20.4041670.8888260.518206
R2_aj0.3782610.8822870.482251
χ2 SC (1)1.6499222.3635892.605154
χ2 HET (1)0.8895103.7694353.434376
F-statistic15.60141***135.9138***14.41272***
Durbin – Watson stat2.1848262.4538402.315884

Notes:

Critical values for the bounds test: case III: unrestricted intercept and no trend, Narayan and Smyth (2005, p. 1988);

***,

** and

*indicate statistical significance at 1, 5 and 10% respectively

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal