Table 4 Structural model results Direct...

Table 4

Structural model results

Direct effects	Coeff	Std. Dev	p-value	LCI 95%	UCI 95%	f²
H1a: Competitive intensity → SC agility	0.208	0.058	<0.001	0.094	0.322	0.045
H1b: Competitive intensity → SC adaptability	0.309	0.057	<0.001	0.197	0.421	0.104
H1c: Competitive intensity → SC alignment	0.323	0.057	<0.001	0.212	0.435	0.113
H2a: SC complexity → SC agility	−0.055	0.060	0.180	−0.171	0.062	0.005
H2b: SC complexity → SC adaptability	0.121	0.059	0.021	0.005	0.236	0.021
H2c: SC complexity → SC alignment	0.159	0.059	0.003	0.045	0.274	0.033
H3a: Business strategy → SC agility	0.193	0.058	<0.001	0.079	0.307	0.038
H3b: Business strategy → SC adaptability	0.162	0.059	0.003	0.047	0.277	0.024
H3c: Business strategy → SC alignment	0.189	0.058	<0.001	0.075	0.303	0.036
Competitive intensity → business strategy	−0.116	0.059	0.025	−0.232	-0.001	0.012
SC complexity → business strategy	0.131	0.059	0.013	0.016	0.246	0.016

Direct effects	Coeff	Std. Dev	p-value	LCI 95%	UCI 95%	f²
H1a: Competitive intensity → SC agility	0.208	0.058	<0.001	0.094	0.322	0.045
H1b: Competitive intensity → SC adaptability	0.309	0.057	<0.001	0.197	0.421	0.104
H1c: Competitive intensity → SC alignment	0.323	0.057	<0.001	0.212	0.435	0.113
H2a: SC complexity → SC agility	−0.055	0.060	0.180	−0.171	0.062	0.005
H2b: SC complexity → SC adaptability	0.121	0.059	0.021	0.005	0.236	0.021
H2c: SC complexity → SC alignment	0.159	0.059	0.003	0.045	0.274	0.033
H3a: Business strategy → SC agility	0.193	0.058	<0.001	0.079	0.307	0.038
H3b: Business strategy → SC adaptability	0.162	0.059	0.003	0.047	0.277	0.024
H3c: Business strategy → SC alignment	0.189	0.058	<0.001	0.075	0.303	0.036
Competitive intensity → business strategy	−0.116	0.059	0.025	−0.232	-0.001	0.012
SC complexity → business strategy	0.131	0.059	0.013	0.016	0.246	0.016

Indirect effects	Coeff	Std. Dev	p-value	LCI 95%	UCI 95%	f²
H4a: CI → strategy → SC agility	−0.022	0.023	0.163	−0.067	0.023	0.005
H4b: CI → strategy → SC adaptability	−0.019	0.028	0.255	−0.074	0.036	0.006
H4c: CI → strategy → SC alignment	−0.022	0.028	0.218	−0.077	0.033	0.008
H5a: SC-C → strategy → SC agility	0.025	0.029	0.191	−0.032	0.082	0.002
H5b: SC-C → strategy → SC adaptability	0.021	0.032	0.253	−0.042	0.084	0.004
H5c: SC-C → strategy → SC alignment	0.025	0.032	0.223	−0.038	0.088	0.005

Indirect effects	Coeff	Std. Dev	p-value	LCI 95%	UCI 95%	f²
H4a: CI → strategy → SC agility	−0.022	0.023	0.163	−0.067	0.023	0.005
H4b: CI → strategy → SC adaptability	−0.019	0.028	0.255	−0.074	0.036	0.006
H4c: CI → strategy → SC alignment	−0.022	0.028	0.218	−0.077	0.033	0.008
H5a: SC-C → strategy → SC agility	0.025	0.029	0.191	−0.032	0.082	0.002
H5b: SC-C → strategy → SC adaptability	0.021	0.032	0.253	−0.042	0.084	0.004
H5c: SC-C → strategy → SC alignment	0.025	0.032	0.223	−0.038	0.088	0.005

Model estimation	R²	R² adjusted	Stone-geisser's Q²
Competitive strategy	0.027	0.020	0.031
SC agility	0.078	0.068	0.087
SC adaptability	0.148	0.139	0.143
SC alignment	0.182	0.173	0.177

Note(s): CI: competitive intensity; SC-C: supply chain complexity; LCI: lower confidence interval; UCI: ppper confidence interval. Values of f² higher than 0.020, 0.150 and 0.350 can be interpreted as small, medium and large size effects, respectively

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable