Table 2. Correlations, means and...

Table 2.

Correlations, means and standard deviations

		M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1	Leader age	38.261	10.496
2	Member age	32.159	9.598	0.160
3	Leader gender	1.534	0.502	–0.282**	0.013
4	Member gender	1.477	0.502	–0.146	–0.135	0.163
5	Leader qualification	4.296	1.063	0.123	0.116	–0.062	–0.289**
6	Member qualification	3.841	1.231	–0.001	0.075	–0.177	–0.173	0.555**
7	Intent to remain in the dyad	4.057	0.957	–0.082	0.215*	0.080	–0.093	0.164	–0.124
8	Task complexity	4.693	0.986	–0.374**	–0.132	0.079	0.110	0.164	0.337**	0.082
9	Task interdependence	5.690	0.552	–0.060	0.066	0.207	0.101	–0.095	–0.170	0.108	0.027
10	Dyadic tenure	2.588	2.181	0.155	0.436**	0.003	–0.064	–0.077	–0.142	0.281**	–0.079	0.179
11	Goal interdependence	5.271	0.919	–0.099	–0.146	–0.031	–0.080	–0.138	–0.002	0.031	0.266*	0.322**	0.080
12	Perceived SMM similarity	5.677	0.593	0.088	0.030	–0.036	–0.150	0.067	0.111	0.055	0.084	0.144	0.406**	0.455**
13	Dyadic performance	6.072	0.628	–0.163	0.128	0.047	–0.049	–0.090	–0.015	0.038	0.161	0.155	0.163	0.376**	0.368**

		M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1	Leader age	38.261	10.496
2	Member age	32.159	9.598	0.160
3	Leader gender	1.534	0.502	–0.282**	0.013
4	Member gender	1.477	0.502	–0.146	–0.135	0.163
5	Leader qualification	4.296	1.063	0.123	0.116	–0.062	–0.289**
6	Member qualification	3.841	1.231	–0.001	0.075	–0.177	–0.173	0.555**
7	Intent to remain in the dyad	4.057	0.957	–0.082	0.215*	0.080	–0.093	0.164	–0.124
8	Task complexity	4.693	0.986	–0.374**	–0.132	0.079	0.110	0.164	0.337**	0.082
9	Task interdependence	5.690	0.552	–0.060	0.066	0.207	0.101	–0.095	–0.170	0.108	0.027
10	Dyadic tenure	2.588	2.181	0.155	0.436**	0.003	–0.064	–0.077	–0.142	0.281**	–0.079	0.179
11	Goal interdependence	5.271	0.919	–0.099	–0.146	–0.031	–0.080	–0.138	–0.002	0.031	0.266*	0.322**	0.080
12	Perceived SMM similarity	5.677	0.593	0.088	0.030	–0.036	–0.150	0.067	0.111	0.055	0.084	0.144	0.406**	0.455**
13	Dyadic performance	6.072	0.628	–0.163	0.128	0.047	–0.049	–0.090	–0.015	0.038	0.161	0.155	0.163	0.376**	0.368**

Notes:

N = 88 leader–member dyads; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; gender: participants could identify as (1) male, (2) female or (3) not disclose gender (no participant selected this third option); qualification: participants were asked to indicate their highest completed qualification ranging from (1) no formal qualifications to (6) doctoral degree

Source: Table by authors

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable