Table 3. Results for moderated mediation...

Table 3.

Results for moderated mediation

	Main model		Alternative A		Alternative B		Alternative C
	b	SE	b	SE	b	SE	b	SE
Step 1 outcome: perceived SMM similarity
Controls
Task interdependence	−0.092	0.093	–	–	−0.106	0.091	–	–
Task complexity	−0.055	0.102	–	–	0.018	0.088	–	–
Intent to remain in the dyad	−0.039	0.093	–	–	−0.048	0.088	–	–
Leader age	0.037	0.096	0.062	0.088	–	–	–	–
Member age	−0.158	0.097	−0.166^†	0.095	–	–	–	–
Leader gender	0.112	0.092	0.092	0.089	–	–	–	–
Member gender	−0.060	0.091	−0.077	0.088	–	–	–	–
Leader qualification	0.106	0.110	0.077	0.103	–	–	–	–
Member qualification	0.155	0.113	0.163	0.102	–	–	–	–
Main effects
Dyadic tenure (DT)	0.595***	0.104	0.569***	0.100	0.506***	0.095	0.470***	0.089
Moderation
Goal interdependence (GI)	0.393***	0.097	0.348***	0.087	0.397***	0.093	0.371***	0.085
DT × GI	−0.308***	0.083	−0.296***	0.081	−0.278**	0.083	−0.266**	0.082
Step 2 outcome: dyadic performance
Controls
Task interdependence	0.047	0.067	–	–	0.063	0.065	–	–
Task complexity	0.089	0.076	–	–	0.083	0.065	–	–
Intent to remain in the dyad	−0.022	0.072	–	–	−0.005	0.067	–	–
Leader age	−0.104	0.074	−0.133^†	0.068	–	–	–	–
Member age	0.131	0.075	0.120	0.073	–	–	–	–
Leader gender	−0.014	0.069	−0.004	0.068	–	–	–	–
Member gender	−0.037	0.069	−0.021	0.067	–	–	–	–
Leader qualification	−0.070	0.083	−0.070	0.079	–	–	–	–
Member qualification	−0.048	0.087	−0.019	0.079	–	–	–	–
Dyadic tenure	−0.049	0.084	−0.045	0.081	0.014	0.074	0.010	0.069
Mediation
Perceived SMM similarity	0.247**	0.074	0.261**	0.072	0.210**	0.070	0.227**	0.069
R² Step 1	0.496		0.486		0.431		0.418
F Step 1	6.151***		8.198***		10.214***		20.114***
R² Step 2	0.232		0.212		0.163		0.136
F Step 2	2.086*		2.658*		3.197**		6.670**

	Main model		Alternative A		Alternative B		Alternative C
	b	SE	b	SE	b	SE	b	SE
Step 1 outcome: perceived SMM similarity
Controls
Task interdependence	−0.092	0.093	–	–	−0.106	0.091	–	–
Task complexity	−0.055	0.102	–	–	0.018	0.088	–	–
Intent to remain in the dyad	−0.039	0.093	–	–	−0.048	0.088	–	–
Leader age	0.037	0.096	0.062	0.088	–	–	–	–
Member age	−0.158	0.097	−0.166^†	0.095	–	–	–	–
Leader gender	0.112	0.092	0.092	0.089	–	–	–	–
Member gender	−0.060	0.091	−0.077	0.088	–	–	–	–
Leader qualification	0.106	0.110	0.077	0.103	–	–	–	–
Member qualification	0.155	0.113	0.163	0.102	–	–	–	–
Main effects
Dyadic tenure (DT)	0.595***	0.104	0.569***	0.100	0.506***	0.095	0.470***	0.089
Moderation
Goal interdependence (GI)	0.393***	0.097	0.348***	0.087	0.397***	0.093	0.371***	0.085
DT × GI	−0.308***	0.083	−0.296***	0.081	−0.278**	0.083	−0.266**	0.082
Step 2 outcome: dyadic performance
Controls
Task interdependence	0.047	0.067	–	–	0.063	0.065	–	–
Task complexity	0.089	0.076	–	–	0.083	0.065	–	–
Intent to remain in the dyad	−0.022	0.072	–	–	−0.005	0.067	–	–
Leader age	−0.104	0.074	−0.133^†	0.068	–	–	–	–
Member age	0.131	0.075	0.120	0.073	–	–	–	–
Leader gender	−0.014	0.069	−0.004	0.068	–	–	–	–
Member gender	−0.037	0.069	−0.021	0.067	–	–	–	–
Leader qualification	−0.070	0.083	−0.070	0.079	–	–	–	–
Member qualification	−0.048	0.087	−0.019	0.079	–	–	–	–
Dyadic tenure	−0.049	0.084	−0.045	0.081	0.014	0.074	0.010	0.069
Mediation
Perceived SMM similarity	0.247**	0.074	0.261**	0.072	0.210**	0.070	0.227**	0.069
R² Step 1	0.496		0.486		0.431		0.418
F Step 1	6.151***		8.198***		10.214***		20.114***
R² Step 2	0.232		0.212		0.163		0.136
F Step 2	2.086*		2.658*		3.197**		6.670**

Notes:

N = 88 leader–member dyads; ^†p < 0.10; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; Alternative A: hypothesised model with only demographic controls; Alternative B: hypothesised model with only contextual controls; Alternative C: hypothesised model with no controls

Source: Table by authors

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable