Table IV

Quantitative feedback from Ph.D. first year Participants

Parameter1
Very poor
2
Poor
3
Acceptable
4
Good
5
Excellent
AverageStandard
Deviation
MaximumMinimum
Design of the course0%0%10%10%80%4.700.644.923.83
Content of the course0%0%0%10%90%4.900.304.903.75
Pedagogy0%0%0%10%90%4.900.304.923.83
Assessment0%0%0%10%90%4.900.304.903.83
Accessibility0%0%0%10%90%4.900.304.904.00
Delivery by the faculty0%0%0%0%100%5.000.005.003.62
Average0%0%1.67 %8.33%90%4.88   

Notes(s): The feedback was collected from 13 participants

Design of the course: How was it structured in terms of flow of concepts/issues and learning in view of the course objectives

Content of the course: Extent to which the contents were relevant and up to date

Pedagogy used in the course: The appropriateness of the teaching and learning method

Assessment: Appropriateness of the assessment, tasks requirements and criteria for evaluation used by the faculty

Accessibility: The extent to which the faculty was open and accessible for providing feedback and counseling for improvement

Delivery by the faculty: The extent to which the faculty was overall effective in meeting the course objectives

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal