Table 1 Sample descriptive statistics...

Table 1

Sample descriptive statistics

Variable	Mean	SD	Min	Max	N
Social media outcomes					303
Average change on internet use	0.545
Average change on Instagram purchase intention	0.394
Average change on Facebook purchase intention	0.253
Pandemic behavioral outcomes
Loneliness index*	66.277	9.807	30	80	303
Personality traits
Openness	3.568	0.523	1.7	4.8	303
Conscientiousness	3.458	0.557	2	4.9	303
Extraversion	3.174	0.604	1.25	4.75	303
Agreeableness	3.695	0.482	2.33	5	303
Neuroticism	2.842	0.647	1.125	5	303
Social cognitive theory
Resilience	3.36	1.07	2.16	4.43	303
Vulnerability	2.97	1.13	2.02	4.23	303
Demographic and social economic attributes
Female (0/1)	0.571	0.496	0	1	173
Age	16.05	1.341	14	17	303
School Grades**	17.855	1.605	12.5	20	303
FAS Index***	12.069	1.862	5	18	303
Single child family	0.089	0.285	0	1	303
Family type
Both parents	0.818				248
Single mother	0.132				40
Single father	0.030				9
Other relative	0.020				6
Family area type
Rural	0.162				49
Suburban	0.297				90
Urban	0.541				164

Variable	Mean	SD	Min	Max	N
Social media outcomes					303
Average change on internet use	0.545
Average change on Instagram purchase intention	0.394
Average change on Facebook purchase intention	0.253
Pandemic behavioral outcomes
Loneliness index*	66.277	9.807	30	80	303
Personality traits
Openness	3.568	0.523	1.7	4.8	303
Conscientiousness	3.458	0.557	2	4.9	303
Extraversion	3.174	0.604	1.25	4.75	303
Agreeableness	3.695	0.482	2.33	5	303
Neuroticism	2.842	0.647	1.125	5	303
Social cognitive theory
Resilience	3.36	1.07	2.16	4.43	303
Vulnerability	2.97	1.13	2.02	4.23	303
Demographic and social economic attributes
Female (0/1)	0.571	0.496	0	1	173
Age	16.05	1.341	14	17	303
School Grades**	17.855	1.605	12.5	20	303
FAS Index***	12.069	1.862	5	18	303
Single child family	0.089	0.285	0	1	303
Family type
Both parents	0.818				248
Single mother	0.132				40
Single father	0.030				9
Other relative	0.020				6
Family area type
Rural	0.162				49
Suburban	0.297				90
Urban	0.541				164

Notes:

*In our analysis, we divided the sample to two groups of loneliness (high vs low) by having the median split of the original variable, **In our analysis we used the high grade variable which contain students with grades above the average (median split), ***In our analysis we used the high FAS index variable which contain subjects with social economic index above the average (median split)

Source: Data set with results drawn from the questionnaire. Author’s calculation

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable