Table 3

Relationship between transfer pricing and tax avoidance/profit shifting

AuthorMethodologyFindingTheoretical gapEmpirical gapProblem
Büttner and Thiemann (2017) Historical analysis, theoretical framework, and empirical researchThe OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) procedure modified the Hedging Guidelines to reduce profit shifting without political risk  Analyzing the impact of the OECD/G20 BEPS process on the global tax system
Richardson and Taylor (2015) Regression analysis, multicollinearity check, and robustness checkMultinationalism, thin capitalization, aggressive transfer pricing, intangible assets, and tax haven use positively correlate with listed U.S. MNCs, suggesting profit-shifting strategies  Investigating the presence of profit-shifting strategies in U.S. listed MNCs
Sari et al. (2022) Quantitative research and multiple linear regression analysisIntangible assets affect transfer pricing decisions regardless of taxes  Assessing the impact of intangible assets on transfer pricing decisions
Amidu et al. (2019) Regression analysisDuring 2008–2015, most sample enterprises used transfer pricing and profits management to evade taxes  Exploring the relationship between transfer pricing, tax avoidance, and profit shifting
Park et al. (2016) Regression analysisMNCs that have increased worldwide diversification by creating overseas subsidiaries tend to have a larger propensity to evade taxesOnly Korean companies are the subject of the investigationAll financial information used in the study is openly accessibleInvestigating the relationship between tax evasion and MNCs' establishment of foreign subsidiaries

Source(s): Table created by author

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options