Simulation results of groundwater in Dak Lak with scenario RCP4.5
| Variables (m3 × 104) | 2016–2035 | 2046–2069 | 2080–2099 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In | Out | In | Out | In | Out | |
| (1) Storage | 257,568.5 | 83,083.6 | 25,7057.4 | 86,575.9 | 257,233.2 | 52,624.9 |
| (2) Constant head | 156,070.3 | 129,988.6 | 131,691.5 | 141,325.6 | 107,898.5 | 135,357.9 |
| (3) Pumping well | 0.0 | 22,520.4 | 0.0 | 22,520.5 | 0.0 | 22,926.9 |
| (4) River leakage | 12,629.6 | 126,119.6 | 12,728.4 | 129,784.4 | 11,696.8 | 141,980.2 |
| (5) Evapotranspiration | 0.0 | 167,249.2 | 0.0 | 184,586.0 | 0.0 | 200,943.0 |
| (6) Recharge | 156,754.0 | 0.0 | 163,210.5 | 0.0 | 176,918.2 | 0.0 |
| (7) Lake seepage | 136.7 | 32.2 | 142.7 | 31.8 | 93.9 | 36.7 |
| Total (1+2+3+4+5+6+7) | 583,159.2 | 528,993.6 | 564,830.5 | 564,824.2 | 553,840.7 | 553,869.7 |
| Potential reserves (Total In - Total Out) | 54,165.5 | 6.3 | −29.0 | |||
| Variables (m3 × 104) | 2016–2035 | 2046–2069 | 2080–2099 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In | Out | In | Out | In | Out | |
| (1) Storage | 257,568.5 | 83,083.6 | 25,7057.4 | 86,575.9 | 257,233.2 | 52,624.9 |
| (2) Constant head | 156,070.3 | 129,988.6 | 131,691.5 | 141,325.6 | 107,898.5 | 135,357.9 |
| (3) Pumping well | 0.0 | 22,520.4 | 0.0 | 22,520.5 | 0.0 | 22,926.9 |
| (4) River leakage | 12,629.6 | 126,119.6 | 12,728.4 | 129,784.4 | 11,696.8 | 141,980.2 |
| (5) Evapotranspiration | 0.0 | 167,249.2 | 0.0 | 184,586.0 | 0.0 | 200,943.0 |
| (6) Recharge | 156,754.0 | 0.0 | 163,210.5 | 0.0 | 176,918.2 | 0.0 |
| (7) Lake seepage | 136.7 | 32.2 | 142.7 | 31.8 | 93.9 | 36.7 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.