Simulation results of groundwater in Dak Lak with scenario RCP8.5
| Variables (m3 × 104) | 2016–2035 | 2046–2069 | 2080–2099 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In | Out | In | Out | In | Out | |
| (1) Storage | 258,234.5 | 82,353.0 | 257,794.2 | 76,331.8 | 257,268.4 | 66,352.5 |
| (2) Constant head | 111,672.6 | 129,562.8 | 104,977.0 | 128,690.5 | 103,907.3 | 126,327.7 |
| (3) Pumping well | 0.0 | 22,520.5 | 0.0 | 22,714.7 | 0.0 | 22,814.9 |
| (4) River leakage | 12,827.6 | 126,908.2 | 13,135.4 | 123,789.4 | 13,880.0 | 120,078.4 |
| (5) Evapotranspiration | 0.0 | 171,813.2 | 0.0 | 193,452.2 | 0.0 | 223,389.7 |
| (6) Recharge | 150,315.0 | 0.0 | 168,909.1 | 0.0 | 183,603.7 | 0.0 |
| (7) Lake seepage | 142.4 | 32.3 | 148.1 | 31.4 | 160.5 | 30.12 |
| Total (1+2+3+4+5+6+7) | 533,192.0 | 533,190.0 | 544,963.8 | 545,009.9 | 558,819.9 | 558,993.3 |
| Potential reserves (Total In - Total Out) | 2.0 | −46.2 | −173.4 | |||
| Variables (m3 × 104) | 2016–2035 | 2046–2069 | 2080–2099 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In | Out | In | Out | In | Out | |
| (1) Storage | 258,234.5 | 82,353.0 | 257,794.2 | 76,331.8 | 257,268.4 | 66,352.5 |
| (2) Constant head | 111,672.6 | 129,562.8 | 104,977.0 | 128,690.5 | 103,907.3 | 126,327.7 |
| (3) Pumping well | 0.0 | 22,520.5 | 0.0 | 22,714.7 | 0.0 | 22,814.9 |
| (4) River leakage | 12,827.6 | 126,908.2 | 13,135.4 | 123,789.4 | 13,880.0 | 120,078.4 |
| (5) Evapotranspiration | 0.0 | 171,813.2 | 0.0 | 193,452.2 | 0.0 | 223,389.7 |
| (6) Recharge | 150,315.0 | 0.0 | 168,909.1 | 0.0 | 183,603.7 | 0.0 |
| (7) Lake seepage | 142.4 | 32.3 | 148.1 | 31.4 | 160.5 | 30.12 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.