Study 2 – Discriminant validity
| Fornell and Larcker results | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High involvement | Low involvement | ||||||||||||
| Aad | Brand love | Brand loyalty | PI | PS | SEI | Aad | Brand love | Brand loyalty | PI | PS | SEI | ||
| Aad | 0.87 | Aad | 0.86 | ||||||||||
| Brand love | 0.25 | 0.92 | Brand love | 0.59 | 0.83 | ||||||||
| Brand loyalty | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.92 | Brand loyalty | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.91 | ||||||
| PI | 0.24 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.94 | PI | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.91 | ||||
| PS | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.83 | PS | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.80 | ||
| SEI | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.92 | SEI | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.92 |
| WOM | 0.34 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.13 | 0.31 | WOM | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.14 |
| Fornell and Larcker results | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High involvement | Low involvement | ||||||||||||
| Aad | Brand | Brand | PI | PS | SEI | Aad | Brand | Brand | PI | PS | SEI | ||
| Aad | Aad | ||||||||||||
| Brand love | 0.25 | Brand love | 0.59 | ||||||||||
| Brand loyalty | 0.33 | 0.75 | Brand loyalty | 0.49 | 0.80 | ||||||||
| PI | 0.24 | 0.65 | 0.65 | PI | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.66 | ||||||
| PS | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.11 | 0.20 | PS | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.53 | ||||
| SEI | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.18 | SEI | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.07 | ||
| WOM | 0.34 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.13 | 0.31 | WOM | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.14 |
Notes:
SEI: Strength of ethnic identification; Aad: Attitude toward the Ad; PI: Purchase intention; PS: Perceived similarity: WOM: Word-of-mouth
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.