Comparison between total indirect and direct effects
| Relationships | Men | Women | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect size (Bootstrap CI/p value) | Sig/ns | Effect size (Bootstrap CI/p value) | Sig/ns | |
| CT → EIs (direct effect) | 0.099 (p = 0.142) | ns | 0.107 (p = 0.063) | Sig |
| GF → EIs (direct effect) | −0.088 (p = 0.155) | ns | −0.190 (p < 0.001) | Sig |
| CT → EIs (through TPB) | 0.262 (0.165, 0.367) | Sig | 0.153 (0.062, 0.249) | Sig |
| GF → EIs (through CT and TPB) | 0.249 (0.145, 0.360) | Sig | 0.087 (−0.016, 0.188) | Sig |
| Relationships | Men | Women | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect size (Bootstrap CI/ | Sig/ns | Effect size (Bootstrap CI/ | Sig/ns | |
| CT → EIs (direct effect) | 0.099 ( | ns | 0.107 ( | Sig |
| GF → EIs (direct effect) | −0.088 ( | ns | −0.190 ( | Sig |
| CT → EIs (through TPB) | 0.262 (0.165, 0.367) | Sig | 0.153 (0.062, 0.249) | Sig |
| GF → EIs (through CT and TPB) | 0.249 (0.145, 0.360) | Sig | 0.087 (−0.016, 0.188) | Sig |
Note(s): sig = significant; ns = not significant
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.