Table 5 Design of experiment results for... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Design of experiment results for each MIP and comparisons

Run	MIP (light loads)				MIP (full loads)			Deltas
Run	T	L	N	IP time	T	N	IP time	∆T	∆N
1	79.64	0.26	243	11,393	81.60	235	24	1.96	−8
2	58.88	0.08	158	311	59.01	153	8	0.12	−5
3	73.24	0.09	253	9,422	73.69	241	18	0.45	−12
4	51.22	0.57	178	20,649	54.19	162	10	2.97	−16
5	77.84	0.01	236	1,646	77.86	235	2	0.02	−1
6	54.43	0.34	163	134	55.47	156	4	1.03	−7
7	67.68	0.35	260	3,532	69.21	248	7	1.53	−12
8	49.84	0.04	168	702	49.90	167	3	0.05	−1
9	58.03	0.17	250	66,872	58.66	233	57	0.64	−17
10	39.87	0.63	167	192	43.15	151	16	3.28	−16
11	48.84	0.77	271	29,677	57.01	232	31	8.18	−39
12	40.44	0.61	201	144,473	42.47	150	7	2.03	−51
13	52.90	0.54	250	5,416	54.53	235	2	1.63	−15
14	39.42	0.09	160	59	39.81	153	4	0.39	−7
15	48.61	0.12	258	284	48.98	244	7	0.37	−14
16	33.87	0.75	185	69	36.26	164	3	2.39	−21
Avg	54.67	0.34	213	18,427	56.36	198	13	1.69	−15

Run	MIP (light loads)				MIP (full loads)			Deltas
Run	T	L	N	IP time	T	N	IP time	∆T	∆N
1	79.64	0.26	243	11,393	81.60	235	24	1.96	−8
2	58.88	0.08	158	311	59.01	153	8	0.12	−5
3	73.24	0.09	253	9,422	73.69	241	18	0.45	−12
4	51.22	0.57	178	20,649	54.19	162	10	2.97	−16
5	77.84	0.01	236	1,646	77.86	235	2	0.02	−1
6	54.43	0.34	163	134	55.47	156	4	1.03	−7
7	67.68	0.35	260	3,532	69.21	248	7	1.53	−12
8	49.84	0.04	168	702	49.90	167	3	0.05	−1
9	58.03	0.17	250	66,872	58.66	233	57	0.64	−17
10	39.87	0.63	167	192	43.15	151	16	3.28	−16
11	48.84	0.77	271	29,677	57.01	232	31	8.18	−39
12	40.44	0.61	201	144,473	42.47	150	7	2.03	−51
13	52.90	0.54	250	5,416	54.53	235	2	1.63	−15
14	39.42	0.09	160	59	39.81	153	4	0.39	−7
15	48.61	0.12	258	284	48.98	244	7	0.37	−14
16	33.87	0.75	185	69	36.26	164	3	2.39	−21
Avg	54.67	0.34	213	18,427	56.36	198	13	1.69	−15

Note(s): GAMS/CPLEX optimality tolerance set at 1% for each MIP solution