Classification resultsa
| BDA adoption | Predicted group membership | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovators | Early majority | Laggards | ||||
| Original | Count | Innovators | 47 | 0 | 16 | 63 |
| Early majority | 20 | 0 | 18 | 38 | ||
| Laggards | 5 | 0 | 12 | 17 | ||
| % | Innovators | 74.6 | 0.0 | 25.4 | 100.0 | |
| Early majority | 52.6 | 0.0 | 47.4 | 100.0 | ||
| Laggards | 29.4 | 0.0 | 70.6 | 100.0 | ||
| BDA adoption | Predicted group membership | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovators | Early majority | Laggards | ||||
| Original | Count | Innovators | 47 | 0 | 16 | 63 |
| Early majority | 20 | 0 | 18 | 38 | ||
| Laggards | 5 | 0 | 12 | 17 | ||
| % | Innovators | 74.6 | 0.0 | 25.4 | 100.0 | |
| Early majority | 52.6 | 0.0 | 47.4 | 100.0 | ||
| Laggards | 29.4 | 0.0 | 70.6 | 100.0 | ||
Note(s): a. 50.0% of original grouped cases correctly classified
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.